Enhancement of penalty u/s 78 from 25% to 100% by the ...

Case Laws Service Tax

April 8, 2020

Enhancement of penalty u/s 78 from 25% to 100% by the corrigendum order - WCS was highly litigated and lot of interpretation issues were there. Taking pragmatic view of the matter, it is found that there is no contumacious conduct on the part of the appellant and accordingly, the penalty under section 78 & section 77 is set aside - the corrigendum was issued beyond jurisdiction, and is a nonest in law. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Enhancement of penalty u/s 78 from 25% to 100% by the ...

Case Laws Service Tax

April 8, 2020

You may also like:

Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

Benefit of reduced penalty u/s 78 - the appellant had failed to deposit 25% of the imposed penalty before the issuance of show cause notice or within 30 days of...

Levy of penalty at reduced rate of 25% of tax - assessee sought full waiver - The authority has used his discretionary power, which he is empowered u/s 78- The reduction...

Option to pay 25% of the service tax towards penalty under Section 78 - assessee given an option to pay 25% of the service tax towards penalty under Section 78 of...

Waiver of penalty is pleaded as the penalty under Section 78 ibid has been imposed and for an option to pay 25% (reduced) mandatory penalty under Section 78 ibid as the...

Levy of penalty - appellant puts on record that they have paid 25% of penalty under Section 78 and undertakes not to claim refund of the same - Relief granted to assessee - AT

Availability of alternative remedy of appeal - requirement of pre-deposit of 100% of penalty or 25% u/s 107 of CGST Act - If the requirement in law is that the...

Whether penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 can be reduced to 25% by invoking the provisions of first proviso to Section 78, when the assessee has...

Reduction in the quantum of penalty imposed u/s 78 - Unless the penalty under Section 78 of the Act itself is leviable on the Assessee, there is no question of any...

Depreciation on machinery and equipments - Depreciation @ 25% or 100% - Even before this Court, learned counsel for the Assessee was unable to demonstrate why the...

Default in payment of service tax - Benefit of reduced penalty u/s 78 - the major demand amount already stands paid by them - the Appellant is entitled to pay reduced...

Levy of Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - The assessee/appellant has the option to deposit the balance service tax together with accumulated interest and penalty...

Whether the unamended provision of Section 78 according to which 100% penalty or amended provision of Section 78 according to which 50% penalty is applicable in the case...

Imposition of 100% penalty instead of 25% - if there is any short payment they would have been be asked to pay at that stage and the matter could have been come to an...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

Quick Updates: