Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2020 Year 2020 This

Penalty u/s 271D - reasonable cause - mere proof regarding ...


Proving transaction genuineness or intention isn't enough to avoid penalty u/s 271D for Section 269SS violations.

June 22, 2020

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Penalty u/s 271D - reasonable cause - mere proof regarding genuineness of the transaction or the intention in accepting the amounts in cash or that there was no attempt to induct black money into the business etc. cannot be considered as a reasonable cause or as compelling circumstances provided u/s 273B to avoid the penal action contemplated u/s 271D, with respect to violation of the provisions contained under Section 269SS.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

  2. Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash credit - It is well settled principle that the repayment of cash credit would not prove the genuineness of cash credit. It is the...

  3. Unexplained unsecured loan - the necessary papers to establish genuineness of the transaction were filed and the assessee had proved beyond doubt the identity of the...

  4. Exemption of purchase Tax – Genuineness of the transactions - Goods bought prior to cancellation of registration – When the said dealer has not proved the genuineness...

  5. Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Genuineness - Onus to prove - Mere production of the invoices or the payment made by cheques is not enough and cannot be said to be discharging...

  6. Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

  7. Addition u/s 68 - We do not understand proposition of the assessee that cash had changed the hands from the company to its promoter–Director without any reason and there...

  8. Bogus LTCG - genuineness of transaction not proved - exemption u/s 10(38) - assessee failed to prove genuineness of transaction and long-term capital gain on sale of...

  9. In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

  10. Addition u/s 68 - creditworthiness of investor unexplained - the documents submitted to prove the genuineness of transaction are itself from to be malaises created with...

  11. The assessee had demonstrated the genuineness of the share transaction resulting in long-term capital gains, which were claimed as exempt u/s 10(38). The Revenue...

  12. Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

  13. Addition u/s 68 - unsecured loans - The loan transactions are routed through regular banking channels and reflected duly in the annual accounts of the lender company....

  14. Addition u/s 68 - bogus share capital & share premium - The assessee failed to prove that the transactions of share application money is genuine and the creditworthiness...

  15. Penalty u/s 271D - accepting cash loan of Rs. 2 lakh in aggregate without any reasonable cause in contravention to section 269SS - transactions between father and son,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates