Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2020 Year 2020 This

Exemption under Section 54 - Assessee had purchased more than ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

June 22, 2020

Exemption under Section 54 - Assessee had purchased more than two houses - Subsequent amendment of Section 54(1) also fortifies the fact that the legislature felt the need of amending the provisions of the Act with a view to give a definite meaning to the expression 'a residential house', which was interpreted as plural by various courts by taking into account the context in which the aforesaid expression was used.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Deduction u/s 54 - LTCG invested in buying two residential units - the assessee would only entitle to the benefit of section 54, 1) if the assessee invested the LTCG...

  2. Disallowance u/s 54F - Investment of Sale consideration for claiming exemption on LTCG - Advance was given for purchase of new residential property but the transaction...

  3. Deduction u/s. 54F - claim in respect of the additional floors added to the new house - it is not the case of the department that the claim of the assessee is for an...

  4. Addition u/s.69 or 68 - assessee has paid on-money towards purchase of property to the seller - The assessee is only owner of 1/3rd share in the property purchased. -...

  5. LTCG - Benefit of exemption u/s 54F - Purchase of second residential house - assessee already owns one residential house in USA - Contention of the Ld. AR that the...

  6. Deduction u/s 54F - assessee purchased two properties - the requirement of the proviso is that if the assessee purchases any residential house other than the new asset...

  7. Deduction u/s 54 - investment in two different houses - The Hon’ble Court’s opinion is that, the physical structure of a new residential house whether it is literal or...

  8. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

  9. Adjustment u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure claim u/s 11(1) was made without providing reasonable opportunity to assessee, violating second Proviso of Section...

  10. The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

  11. Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) or penalty u/s.271AAA - The provisions of Section 271AAA(3) of the Act specifically excludes the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the...

  12. Exemption u/s 11 - Application of provisions of "Accumulation of income" for Notional Income (Rent) - the assessee has violated the provisions of section 13(1)(c) r.w.s....

  13. Entitlement to exemption u/s 54F - amount is not directly invested in purchasing of the villa - deposit of money by the assessee inter-alia in mutual fund prior to...

  14. Capital gains - treating information contained in ITS as related to transaction of sale of immovable property - Assessee had pointed out how the two transactions...

  15. Deduction u/s 54F is not available to an assessee who owns more than one house property at the time of purchasing a new property. The assessee, despite jointly...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates