Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2020 Year 2020 This

Refund alongwith interest - Recovery of interest from the erring ...


Court Orders 6% Interest Until Consumer Welfare Fund Credit, Then 18% Until Payment; Excess Recovered from Officers.

July 29, 2020

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

Refund alongwith interest - Recovery of interest from the erring officers - the interest of 6% would be payable up to the date when the amount was credited in the account of the Consumer Welfare Fund. However, after that date the petitioner should be entitled to higher rate of interest say 18% till the date of actual payment and the excess amount of interest so paid to be recovered from the officers found responsible for not making payment in time after due inquiry by the Department. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The appellants challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) denying eligible interest on the refunded amount. The court held that interest accrued on the deposited...

  2. HC held that petitioner was entitled to refund of IGST and Service Tax paid on ocean freight following Mohit Minerals precedent. While addressing unjust enrichment...

  3. Principles of unjust enrichment - Refund amount ordered to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund instead of being paid to the appellant - The Tribunal interprets...

  4. Payment of interest u/s 244A to the deductor on the refund of tax made u/s 240 - Since we have awarded simple interest at 6%, we are not granting any cost in this case....

  5. CESTAT determined appellant's entitlement to 12% per annum interest on refund amounts deposited during investigation, overruling Commissioner (Appeals) order of 6%. The...

  6. Interest on Refund - initially the amount was credit to Consumer Welfare Fund later cash refund was allowed - interest on refund allowed. - AT

  7. Profiteering - Sanitary Napkin - allegation is that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of exemption of GST on Sanitary Napkin by way of commensurate reduction in...

  8. The High Court held that petitioners are entitled to pay 10% of the disputed GST amount as a pre-condition for filing an appeal by debiting the amount available in the...

  9. HC ruled on GST reimbursement dispute between petitioner and government entity. Acknowledging State GST Department's confirmation of rate increase from 12% to 18%, court...

  10. Disallowance of excess interest paid - diversion of funds for non-business purposes - It is immaterial how the loan was treated by the Director - as far as the assessee...

  11. Sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) inserted in section 16 of CGST Act retrospectively extend the time limit to avail input tax credit in certain specified cases...

  12. Respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema ticket prices above Rs. 100 during 01.01.2019 to...

  13. The High Court quashed the impugned letter directing payment of pre-deposit through Electronic Cash Ledger, holding that utilizing the Electronic Credit Ledger for...

  14. In a dispute over enhanced share valuation sold to the State of Rajasthan, the SC modified the High Court's judgment regarding interest rates. The Court determined that...

  15. Cash seized during investigation cannot be appropriated towards pre-deposits u/s 35FF of Central Excise Act or Section 129EE of Customs Act as a condition for filing...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates