Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Validity of notice - It is a well ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 6, 2020

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Validity of notice - It is a well settled proposition of law that penalty cannot be initiated for the limb, which is different from the limb for which proposed penalty proceedings has been initiated. Further, if the penalty proceedings has been initiated for one limb and levied under different limb, then the whole penalty proceedings become vitiate. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Validity of notice - It is a well ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 6, 2020

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - ITAT observed that the notice issued by the AO would be bad in law if it did not specify which limb of Section 271(1) (c) the...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) of the Act to be bad in law as it did not specify which limb of section 271(1)(c)...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO initiated penalty on one limb of section 271(1)(c) and had imposed penalty on another limb - Third Member has upheld the view of AM that the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

Penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) - AO has initiated penalty proceedings under one default or limb of section 271(1)(c) of the Act, but levied for another default...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non specification of clear charge - undisclosed unsold inventory - Notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Act was issued without striking off...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - AO is under obligation to specify the appropriate limb of clause (c) of section 271(1) at the time of initiation as well as at...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - manadation of recording satisfaction which limb of the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act was triggered - In a given case, both limbs may...

Quick Updates: