Profiteering - purchase of flat - whether there was any ...

August 29, 2020

Case Laws GST NAPA

Profiteering - purchase of flat - whether there was any additional benefit of ITC with the introduction of GST availed by the Respondent or not. - This case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 as the Respondent had not availed benefit of additional ITC in the post-GST regime. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - purchase of flat - whether there was any ...

August 29, 2020

Case Laws GST NAPA

You may also like:

Profiteering - construction service supplied by the Respondent - It is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he is not...

Profiteering - Respondent had increased the price of the flat after the introduction of GST - benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) not passed on - the Respondent has...

Profiteering - supply of purchase of Flat - it is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he was not required to pass on...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in...

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - the Respondent has not availed any benefit of CENVAT or ITC in the pre and post GST era and hence, there was no additional benefit...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by him by way of commensurate reduction...

Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC although he had charged GST @12% w.e.f. 01.07.2017...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the commensurate benefit of ITC to him - post-GST, the Respondent has been...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation is that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on - project was not under execution before coming into force of...

Profiteering - purchase of flat in Migsun Wynn - allegation of benefit of Input Tax Credit has not be passed on - The Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to...

Profiteering - construction services - The registration and approval of the projects and receipt of the payments had taken place in the post-GST regime and hence, there...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - the Respondent has not reduced the basic price of his flats by 0.14% in case of the above Project due to additional benefit of ITC...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - it is alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat no. A-802 in Respondent’s project “Azea Botanica” - allegation that benefit of reduction in the rate of GST not passed on - contravention...

Profiteering - construction service supplied by the Respondent - post-GST, the Respondent has been benefited from additional ITC to the tune of 8.18% [11.74% (-) 3.56%]...

Quick Updates: