Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The authorities have failed to ...

Tribunal Missteps: Penalty Proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) Must Be Separate from Assessment; No Unaccounted Income Found.

September 3, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The authorities have failed to appreciate that the penalty proceeding and the assessment proceeding are distinct and since, the assessee had not commenced the business, therefore, it could not have earned income, which had not been accounted for. Tribunal has failed to take into account the well settled legal principles that mere disbelief of an explanation will not be sufficient to impose penalty. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The authorities have failed to ...

Tribunal Missteps: Penalty Proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) Must Be Separate from Assessment; No Unaccounted Income Found.

September 3, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal held that despite the addition u/s 69B of the Income Tax Act being justified, the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be levied due to ambiguity...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - It cannot be said that assessee has concealed the particular income with the meaning of section 271(1)(c) of the Act or there is not deep...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - penalty proceedings are distinguished and separate and assessee can raise fresh plea in the penalty proceedings, which has been done in this case - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - combined order of penalty for additions made vide order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. u/s 153A and u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - AO required to initiate two...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in case of voluntary surrender of income - disallowance of claim of loss - Assessee offered the loss voluntarily to avoid litigation and...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Scope of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act cannot be widened later to include within its scope such additions which were not...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) where the validity of assessment order itself is in doubt - Assessment u/s 153A questioned on approval Granted u/s 153D -...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Quick Updates: