Oppression and mismanagement - removal of the Petitioner from ...

Petitioner Oppression and Mismanagement Case Maintained u/s 241; Directors' Removal Requires Majority Shareholder Consent.

October 6, 2020

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of the Petitioner from the Directorship - the instant Company Petition is maintainable U/s.241 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the Petitioner No. 1 deemed to be a shareholder of Respondent No. 1 Company by holding 51% of Shares as held by the Respondent No. 7, and the Petitioner Nos.2 to 4 cannot removed from the position of Directors of R 1 Company, without consent of majority shareholders and it is contrary to law and against the principle of natural justice - Tri

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of the Petitioner from ...

Petitioner Oppression and Mismanagement Case Maintained u/s 241; Directors' Removal Requires Majority Shareholder Consent.

October 6, 2020

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

You may also like:

Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

The NCLAT upheld the NCLT's decision to refuse waiver u/ss 244(1)(a) and (b) of the Companies Act 2013 to the Appellants, who held only 5.83% shareholding, to file an...

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of MD/Director - in the notice there was an agenda for removal of 1st respondent as Managing Director and not director -...

Allegation of oppression and mismanagement - The decision of the majority would prevail in the interest of the Company and its shareholders per se. Therefore, he cannot...

Oppression and mismanagement - the petitioner has been removed as a Director illegally without following due course of law. Further, the Company is in the nature of...

Oppression and mismanagement - the Tribunal has the power to make Interim Orders which it thinks fit for regulation of the conduct of the affairs of the Company -...

Oppression and Mismanagement - This ‘Tribunal’ keeping in mind of the ingredients of Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 comes to a resultant conclusion that...

The crux of the matter revolves around allegations of oppression, mismanagement, illegal sale of company land, allotment of equity shares, appointment and removal of...

Oppression and mismanagement - Determination of minimum shareholding for filing complain / petition against the company - The ‘onus’, to establish ‘Membership’ is on the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

The NCLAT held that the respondents, as legal representatives of a deceased shareholder, have locus standi to maintain a company petition u/s 241 alleging oppression and...

Oppression and Mismanagement - inherent powers of NCLT to cause audit of accounts - allegations of siphoning funds, breach of agreements, and failure to maintain proper...

Oppression and Mismanagement - prayer to waive the requirements prescribed under Section 244 of the Act to enable the Petitioners to apply under Section 241 seeking the...

Oppression and mismanagement - appellant has no inherent right to continue as Managing Director/Director in the 1st respondent unless he is able to carry the majority...

Quick Updates: