Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Companies Law - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2021 Year 2021 This

Allegation of oppression and mismanagement - The decision of the ...


Majority Decision Upheld in Company Mismanagement Case; Director's Removal Not Oppression Due to Absenteeism.

May 18, 2021

Case Laws     Companies Law     Tri

Allegation of oppression and mismanagement - The decision of the majority would prevail in the interest of the Company and its shareholders per se. Therefore, he cannot question such acquisition at this stage and he has questioned the conveyance deed by filing a suit in City Civil Court of Bombay. Further, the only act of oppression of removal of Petitioner as Director is untenable as the post of director remained vacant due to the absence of the Petitioner in several meetings. - Tri

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

  2. Oppression and mismanagement - removal of MD/Director - in the notice there was an agenda for removal of 1st respondent as Managing Director and not director -...

  3. The NCLAT upheld the NCLT's decision to refuse waiver u/ss 244(1)(a) and (b) of the Companies Act 2013 to the Appellants, who held only 5.83% shareholding, to file an...

  4. Oppression and mismanagement - removal of the Petitioner from the Directorship - the instant Company Petition is maintainable U/s.241 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the...

  5. Oppression and mismanagement - appellant has no inherent right to continue as Managing Director/Director in the 1st respondent unless he is able to carry the majority...

  6. Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

  7. The crux of the matter revolves around allegations of oppression, mismanagement, illegal sale of company land, allotment of equity shares, appointment and removal of...

  8. Oppression and Mismanagement - minority shareholders - There was no alternative except liquidation or revival of company through other modes including sale of assets to...

  9. Oppression and mismanagement - the petitioner has been removed as a Director illegally without following due course of law. Further, the Company is in the nature of...

  10. Oppression and Mismanagement - This Appellate Tribunal further finds it surprising that although the Appellants is claiming to hold 94.8% of Share Capital of the 1st...

  11. Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

  12. Corporate dispute involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement by equal shareholders. Key points: Oppression implies lack of probity or equity, intention behind...

  13. Oppression and Mismanagement - Validity of the Lease Deed - Doctrine of Res Sub-Judice - Appellants argued that the Tribunal overstepped its jurisdiction by setting...

  14. Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and...

  15. Disqualification of a director of the financial creditor to sign the Section 7 application was challenged. The application u/s 7, signed by the director of the financial...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates