Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - ...

Court Rules Cross-Examination Request Premature; Petitioner Can Challenge Adverse Decision After Final Order Issued.

November 25, 2020

Case Laws Customs HC

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - The petitioner has approached this Court prematurely as the respondents have only rejected the request made by the petitioner for cross examination of witnesses on the ground that the entire case is based on documentary evidence and there is no necessity for cross examination of witnesses. If there is any legal right available to the petitioner, as contended by them in this writ petition to cross examine the witnesses, they are always at liberty to raise the same as and when any adverse order is passed against them by the respondents through its final orders pursuant to the show cause notice - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - ...

Court Rules Cross-Examination Request Premature; Petitioner Can Challenge Adverse Decision After Final Order Issued.

November 25, 2020

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

HC addressed a challenge regarding natural justice principles in adjudication proceedings. Petitioners sought cross-examination rights of DRI officers following Show...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

The AT dismissed the appeals challenging denial of cross-examination requests for officers who recorded statements under the Customs Act and FERA. The tribunal...

The summary focuses on the rejection of cross-examination of DRI officers and a co-noticee by the competent authority. The main objective of cross-examination is to...

Violation of principles of natural justice - no opportunity of personal hearing granted - High court highlighted the provision u/s 75(4) of the CGST/MGST Act, which...

Demand u/s 74 - violation of principles of natural justice - The High court noted that Section 75(4) of the CGST Act mandates that an opportunity for hearing must be...

Whether an appeal would lie against the decision rejecting the request for cross examination - Tribunal has the power to entertain an appeal against the decision...

Right of the accused for cross-examination of parties, whose statement has been relied upon - In the writ appeal, while acknowledging that cross-examination is a part of...

Violation of principles of natural justice - From the statutory provision of section 138 B, it is not the option for the Adjudicating Authority to allow or not to allow...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

HC held that both appellants must be given opportunity to cross-examine witness Mr. B under Section 138(B) of Customs Act, addressing discriminatory treatment by CESTAT...

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

Quick Updates: