Penalty imposed u/s 271D and 271E - the availing and re–payment ...

Penalties for book entry loans before June 12, 2012, u/ss 271D and 271E deemed unjustified due to reasonable cause.

December 2, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty imposed u/s 271D and 271E - the availing and re–payment of loan through book entries was prior to 12th June 2012. Therefore non–compliance to the provisions of section 269SS and 269T of the Act was due to a reasonable cause. Hence, imposition of penalty under section 271D and 271E of the Act in the facts of the present appeals is unjustified. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty imposed u/s 271D and 271E - the availing and re–payment ...

Penalties for book entry loans before June 12, 2012, u/ss 271D and 271E deemed unjustified due to reasonable cause.

December 2, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

Penalty levied u/s. 271D - transactions through journal entries - assessee shall be deemed to have had reasonable cause to receive the deposits/loans through journal...

Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - creation/ assignment of debt and liabilities vide journal entries - These entries arise in the normal course of day to day business...

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - default committed in violation of section 269SS & 269T - Reliance on search proceeding documents - Transactions being mere book entries -...

Penalty u/s. 271D - assessee has repaid loans/ deposits from various sister concerns through journal entries, i.e., otherwise than account payee cheques/draft - though...

Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

Violation of the provisions of Sections 269SS and 269T - scope of the term "loan" and "deposit" - Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - amount received on account of share...

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - allegation of cash loan having been taken/repaid - The ITAT underscored the principle that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for...

ITAT quashed penalties under sections 271D and 271E for accepting cash loans of Rs. 17,00,000 in violation of section 269SS. Tribunal considered assessee's circumstances...

Income-tax (seventh Amendment) Rules, 2012 - Amends rule 12(1) - Notification

HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that undisclosed income found during a search, related to a pawning business, falls within the scope of Section 269SS of the...

Quick Updates: