Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2020 Year 2020 This

Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT-A interest on SBI constitute other ...


Pr.CIT's Attempt to Revise AO's SBI Interest Classification u/s 263 Rejected Due to Mere Opinion Difference.

December 2, 2020

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT-A interest on SBI constitute other income which was not properly verified by the AO - The present revision is on difference of opinion which the Pr.CIT intends to substitute his opinion in place of decision taken by the AO and revision u/s 263 is not permitted on difference of opinion - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 - Difference of opinion - Tribunal held that an assessment cannot be revised if there is no jurisdictional error in the order or if it has been passed...

  2. When the AO rejects the revised return then the whole return is invalid. In case AO makes addition from the revised return then it means that he recognizes the revised...

  3. The assessee, a university, claimed exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) for the relevant assessment year, which was accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO) after considering the...

  4. Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - order framed u/s 153A - The Tribunal (ITAT) held that, the assessment orders approved u/s 153D cannot be revised u/s 263 without first revising the...

  6. The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

  7. Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

  8. The ITAT Jaipur addressed a case involving a revision u/s 263 concerning the addition u/s 68 based on a report from an investigation in Mumbai. The PCIT contended that...

  9. Revision u/s 263 - Being conscious of the fact that the original assessment order could not be revised under section 263 of the Act due to bar of limitation, as provided...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of an order passed u/s 143(3) by the Assessing Officer (AO), which was revised by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax...

  11. Revision u/s 263 - amount of HUF was deposited not in the account of the HUF but into the account of the individual - CIT has enquired before invoking the provisions of...

  12. AO failed to examine details, relied solely on assessee's submissions, resulting in erroneous assessment prejudicial to Revenue's interests. Assessee borrowed...

  13. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  14. The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

  15. Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposit during the demonization period - The tribunal noted that the AO had conducted an adequate inquiry into the assessee's cash...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates