Benefit of SVLDRS - Credit of amount deposited prior to SCN ...

Court Orders Petitioner to Pay Pending Amount Within 30 Days After Dispute Over SVLDRS Interest Credit Apportionment.

February 20, 2021

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Benefit of SVLDRS - Credit of amount deposited prior to SCN towards Interest - Interestingly, had the declaration filed by the petitioner been accepted, there would have been a total waiver of interest liability, as per the Scheme. - It is the apportionment that has given rise to the present situation and the petitioner must not be made to suffer on account of this, irrelevant fact - Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the amount pending payment under the declaration is liable to be paid within 30 days of receipt of the declaration. Since the petitioner has enjoyed an order of interim stay during the pendency of this writ petition, the period of 30 days for effecting payment will start today. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Benefit of SVLDRS - Credit of amount deposited prior to SCN ...

Court Orders Petitioner to Pay Pending Amount Within 30 Days After Dispute Over SVLDRS Interest Credit Apportionment.

February 20, 2021

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice as the petitioner did not respond to prior notices leading to the disputed order. Discrepancies...

The appellants made the payment on 25.08.2020 under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS). The dispute was whether this payment would...

The High Court, considering the precedent set in the case of Rehoboth Fish Meal and Oil Plant, held that the petitioner should be granted a stay on recovery proceedings...

SVLDRS - petitioner failed to pay the declared amount within 30 days from the date of issue of notice - The prayers made in this writ petition cannot be granted for...

Petitioner's denial of benefit under Sabka Vishwas (Legal Dispute Resolution) Scheme 2019 (SVLDRS) for short payment of service tax was challenged. The payment was made...

The petitioner failed to deposit the required amount under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, despite receiving Form SVLDRS-3 from the...

Dishonour of cheque case instituted within 30 days from legal notice date satisfies condition precedent for cognizance u/s 138 and 142(b) of NI Act. Complaint within...

Rejection of request for provisional release of the seized goods - high end wrist watches - prohibited goods or not - In the present case, the appellant had not only...

SEBI has revised the requirement for mandatory settlement of client funds who have not traded in the last 30 calendar days. Such clients' entire credit balance shall now...

The appellants challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) denying eligible interest on the refunded amount. The court held that interest accrued on the deposited...

The High Court interpreted Section 140(5) of the CGST Act regarding transition of credit. The petitioner sought extension under the proviso to Section 140(5) but was...

Challenging the validity of show cause notice (SCN) - Recovery of Swachh Bharat Cess - service provided by the petitioner by putting in rail linings - The High Court...

Petitioner failed to substantiate Input Tax Credit claim due to lack of supplier certificates. Discrepancy noted between Input Tax Credit availed in GSTR 3B and...

The High Court allowed the petition seeking revocation of registration cancellation u/s 30 of the GST Act. The Court recognized the serious consequences of cancellation...

The SC held that under the Arbitration Act, 1940, a contractual clause barring interest claims must explicitly prohibit interest in case of disputes, differences,...

Quick Updates: