Court has right to frame new or additional substantial question ...

Court Can Frame New Legal Questions During Hearings Under Proviso of Sub-Section 4, Section 260A.

October 12, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Court has right to frame new or additional substantial question of law at the stage of hearing in pursuance to power conferred by the proviso of Sub- Section 4 of Section 260A - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Court has right to frame new or additional substantial question ...

Court Can Frame New Legal Questions During Hearings Under Proviso of Sub-Section 4, Section 260A.

October 12, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Hearing of appeal by High Court - appeal heard on merit without framing questions, on the basis of questions of law raised in appeal - The appeals are remanded to the...

Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain...

Validity of Judgement of High Court - While admitting the appeal of the Revenue, the High Court has framed 10 question of laws - However, while disposing the appeal, the...

Eligibility to deduction u/s 35D to the Bank - High Court should have frame substantial question of law before hearing appeal bipartite - issue remanded to High Court...

Denial of specific request for personal hearing - The High Court noted that the petitioner had indeed expressed a legitimate difficulty in availing the opportunity for a...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

Proviso to Section 45(1) of PMLA permits certain categories of accused, including women, to be released on bail without satisfying twin requirements u/s 45. While woman...

The High Court found a violation of the principles of natural justice due to the Assessing Authority's denial of an oral hearing opportunity. The court held that even if...

The Allahabad High Court addressed the denial of a personal hearing in a tax assessment case, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings u/s 75(4) of the U.P. GST...

Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme court has held that, the jurisdiction of the High Court to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts...

Legal question can be raised at the stage of the appeal and such a question need not be raised as a ground. It can be argued by a counsel at the time of hearing. When...

Determination of tax u/s 73(9) of the CGST/SGST Act - petitioner submits that the order is passed merely on the representation of the petitioner without giving any...

Money Laundering - Scheduled offences - whether the Non-Bailable Warrants (NBW) issued against the petitioner are liable to be quashed? - The High Court affirmed the...

Liability of legal representative (LR) of deceased - validity of assessment order passed u/s 147 against only one LR - The High Court held that the impugned assessment...

Quick Updates: