Erection Commissioning and Installation – - no merit in the ...

Court Rules Intermediaries' Involvement in Installation Services is Taxable, Rejecting Appellants' Claims of Non-Taxable Activities.

October 12, 2012

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Erection Commissioning and Installation – - no merit in the argument of the appellants that they were only an intermediary and not doing the work themselves and hence their activities did not amount to any service - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Erection Commissioning and Installation – - no merit in the ...

Court Rules Intermediaries' Involvement in Installation Services is Taxable, Rejecting Appellants' Claims of Non-Taxable Activities.

October 12, 2012

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

CESTAT rejected appellant's challenge against service tax classification of after-sales and promotional services provided to foreign company's Indian customers during...

Intermediary services or not - Revenue has not shown as to how the Appellant has acted as intermediary between the two persons namely service provider and service...

Refund of unutilised CENVAT Credit - intermediary services or not - POPOS Rules - export of services - The learned CESTAT has rightly concluded that all services except...

Refund of service tax paid - Export of services or not - intermediary - Rule 2(f) read with Rule 9 of Place of provision of Service Rules, 2012, clearly provides that...

Export of services or not - intermediary, commission and marketing service fee received - the activity of the assessee-appellant rendered is ‘intermediary service’...

The CESTAT held that the services rendered by the appellant to overseas universities/colleges amounted to 'Export of Service' and not 'intermediary service'. It observed...

Classification of services - Reverse charge mechanism (RCM) - Place of provision of services - Services procured from two overseas companies by the appellant, a Special...

Classification of services provided by Grant Thornton, India to develop the "Grant Thornton" brand name and the payment received towards reimbursement of "Brand...

Refund of Service Tax erroneously paid - intermediary service or not - place of supply of services - The appellant is not said to be acting as an intermediary i.e., the...

Valuation of service - service towards installation or commissioning - whether 33% of the price/ value should be treated as value of taxable service towards installation...

CESTAT ruled against Revenue's contention that services constituted intermediary services u/r 9 of Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012. The Tribunal emphasized...

Valuation - Cable Operator’s Services - Appellant cannot exclude the amounts received for maintenance charges from taxable value in view the Sub-Rule 1 of Rule 5 of...

Determination of the taxable value for payment of service tax on reverse charge basis by the service recipient in respect of Goods Transport Agency (GTA) Services. The...

Levy of service tax - Business Auxiliary Service or not - The appellant is neither related to import of goods nor any sale of goods and also nor concern with the payment...

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - intermediary services in terms of Rule 2(f) of Place of Provision of Rules, 2012 - POPOS Rules - location of service provider -...

Quick Updates: