Validity of revision jurisdiction u/s. 263 - It is not in ...

Principal Commissioner Can't Use Explanation-2, Section 263 for Previous Year Transactions Accepted by Revenue for Business Purposes.

May 12, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of revision jurisdiction u/s. 263 - It is not in dispute that the borrowings and interest free advances to IHCL were made in earlier years and not during the year under consideration. In earlier orders we find that the borrowings made by the assessee and its utilisation thereof by way of interest free advance to IHCL has been accepted by the Revenue in scrutiny assessment proceedings, as meant for business purposes. - the reliance placed by the ld. PCIT on the provisions of Explanation-2 to Section 263 of the Act would not be relevant at all for the purpose of adjudication. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of revision jurisdiction u/s. 263 - It is not in ...

Principal Commissioner Can't Use Explanation-2, Section 263 for Previous Year Transactions Accepted by Revenue for Business Purposes.

May 12, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Disallowance of businesses expenditure - previous year begins from the date of setting up of the business. Therefore, it is only after the business is set up that the...

In a recent High Court case, the issue of whether advertisement expenditure could be considered as allowable revenue expenditure was discussed. The ITAT allowed the...

Transfer pricing adjustment to international transactions - Non-satisfaction of conditions prescribed u/r 10B(4) for using multiple year data. Assessee required to...

Addition u/s 68 for director's loan ledger account was made by assessing officer (AO) considering transactions not matching previous year's financial statements....

Amendment of section 44AD. - computing profits and gains of business on presumptive basis - where an assessee declares profit for any previous year in accordance with...

Disallowance on account of foreign exchange fluctuation loss - It is an undisputed fact that for the assessment year 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2016-17, the assessee declared...

The High Court held that the acquisition of the trademark 'FABINDIA' during the financial year 2006-07 could not be treated as an international transaction within the...

Setting up of business during the year under consideration - Assessee having invested substantial amount in the purchase of another property in the year itself, thus,...

Revision u/s 263 - unverified URD purchases - All these transactions are interconnected and linked with each other. If any of the transaction is doubted then...

Set off of brought forward business loss - mistakes in previous years for not claiming benefit of set-off - 8 years time limit provided in the statute - The ITAT found...

Disallowing claim of expenditure - non-carrying of business activity during the year under reference - The case involved an appeal by an assessee against the...

Penalty u/s 271-D and 271-E - accepting loan in cash from the director of the company - The tribunal held that, the assessee`s case under consideration the transactions...

Addition u/s 68 - old outstanding sundry credit balances - the expression “any previous year” to mean as not referring to all the previous years, but, the previous year...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for addition u/s 68 on share premium received by petitioner from Gold Singapore was challenged. Reassessment proceedings initiated...

TP Adjustment - payment of technical knowhow fees - benchmarking of the transaction - Intragroup services or for that matter any international transaction is required to...

Quick Updates: