Validity of unilateral changes made to the Resolution Plan - ...

Court Rules Banks Decide on Resolution Plan Changes in Insolvency Case; Declines to Implement Lenders Meeting Conclusions.

May 13, 2021

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy HC

Validity of unilateral changes made to the Resolution Plan - implementation of Resolution Plan - It is for the respondent Banks to take a decision as to whether the petitioner Company should be revived and whether additional money has to be pumped in by them, but this Court cannot give a direction to take forward the conclusions arrived in the Joint Lenders Meeting held on 19th and 27th of March, 2020, to the logical end. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of unilateral changes made to the Resolution Plan - ...

Court Rules Banks Decide on Resolution Plan Changes in Insolvency Case; Declines to Implement Lenders Meeting Conclusions.

May 13, 2021

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy HC

You may also like:

The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

Demand of KGST when the resolution plan was approved - Jurisdiction and applicability of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) over statutory dues. The court...

Implementation of the Resolution Plan and change in management and control - Demand of customs duty - The appellant did not file any claim during the insolvency process,...

This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the non-filing of claims by the revenue during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the...

CESTAT (Appellate Tribunal) addressed whether appeals continue post initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and approval of Resolution plan u/s...

The High Court held that the Execution Application filed by the Applicant against the Respondent does not survive due to the approved Resolution Plan under the...

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant did not violate any provisions of law, including Regulation 37(ba)...

The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the...

The case involves an appeal before CESTAT regarding continuation post Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under IBC, 2016. NCLT approved a Resolution Plan...

Withdrawal/modification of approved Resolution Plan - Section 31(1) of IBC - The Supreme Court addressed cross-appeals concerning the approval of a resolution plan under...

The High Court examined the issue of liability to clear statutory dues post-insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. The resolution plan...

Challenge to an interim arbitral award u/s 31(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The key issues are: (1) whether the rejection of an application u/s 16...

Non-compliance with submission of Performance Bank Guarantee by the Appellant as per the Request for Resolution Plan's clause obliging the Resolution Applicant to...

Refund of pre-deposit alongwith interest - CIRP - Approval of Resolution Plan under IBC - Analyzing the insolvency proceedings and the subsequent approval of the...

The High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan...

Quick Updates: