Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2021 Year 2021 This

Approval of resolution plan - during the CIRP of ACIL, no valuer ...


Lack of Valuer Leads to SEZ Business Exclusion in ACIL's Insolvency Resolution Plan Under CIRP.

May 18, 2021

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy     AT

Approval of resolution plan - during the CIRP of ACIL, no valuer was appointed to determine the fair value of the shares held by the the Corporate Debtor. Therefore, the assets of the Corporate Debtor (Respondent) cannot be included in the resolution plan - Thus, the SEZ Business of the Corporate Debtor is not included in the resolution plan submitted by the Appellant. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the non-filing of claims by the revenue during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the...

  2. Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

  3. NCLAT dismissed an appeal concerning pre-CIRP electricity dues, affirming NCLT's jurisdiction over post-resolution plan disputes under IBC Section 60(5). The Tribunal...

  4. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the approval of the resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority. The key findings were:...

  5. The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

  6. The High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan...

  7. Exclusion of commercial spaces from the assets of the Corporate Debtor and the entitlement of dissenting Financial Creditors u/s 30(2)(b) of the Insolvency and...

  8. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant did not violate any provisions of law, including Regulation 37(ba)...

  9. The Noida authority had terminated the lease deed of the subject land prior to the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of the Corporate...

  10. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) does not have jurisdiction to substitute the successful resolution applicant (SRA) with another entity who was not part of the Corporate...

  11. CESTAT (Appellate Tribunal) addressed whether appeals continue post initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and approval of Resolution plan u/s...

  12. The NCLAT held that the requirement of obtaining a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from stock exchanges under Regulation 37(1) and (2) of the LODR (Listing Obligations...

  13. Withdrawal of Resolution Plan - resolution plan was approved by Committee of Creditors - the existing insolvency framework in India provides no scope for effecting...

  14. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellant challenging the approval of the resolution plan for the Corporate Debtor. The key points are: The Interim...

  15. Rejection of valuation report obtained by the RP from its valuers - The NCLAT observed that, Resolution Professional appointed valuers for asset valuation under CIRP...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates