Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2021 Year 2021 This

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Assessing Officer has to ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

July 31, 2021

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Assessing Officer has to record satisfaction before initiating penalty proceedings and the penalty proceedings are subject to judicial scrutiny independent of additions/disallowances made under assessment proceedings. Therefore, levy of penalty for the reason that the addition/disallowance has been accepted by the assessee is not sustainable ground - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

  3. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

  4. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  5. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

  7. Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

  8. The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

  9. The assessment order passed u/s 153C was erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC instead of...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - penalty initiated u/s 143(3) order for concealment of particulars of income - penalty imposed for furnishing of...

  11. Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

  12. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

  13. Levy of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - The failure of the Assessing Officer to record such satisfaction makes the order levying penalty invalid and bad in law and such...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income has not been made out against the assessee. - Though, similar disallowances were made by...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates