Classification of imported goods - the appellant accepted the ...

Appellant's Mis-Declaration of Imported Goods Upheld; Duty Demand Stands, But Redemption Fine and Penalty Reduced.

August 17, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

Classification of imported goods - the appellant accepted the mis-declaration in writing. If the pipes and profiles were indeed old, the appellant could have, instead of accepting a mis-declaration, requested for mutilation of these goods as per Section 24 so that they can no longer be used as pipes or profiles but need to be used as scrap only. However, the appellant made a request for spot adjudication accepting the mis-declaration and the order was passed accordingly. The appellant cannot now say that although they wanted a spot adjudication, the department should have still issued a Show Cause Notice. Therefore, the demand of duty in the adjudication order. - The quantum of redemption fine and penalty reduced. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Classification of imported goods - the appellant accepted the ...

Appellant's Mis-Declaration of Imported Goods Upheld; Duty Demand Stands, But Redemption Fine and Penalty Reduced.

August 17, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Mis-declaration of goods - import of PLC Splitter Module - Merely because the appellant sought for duty exemption on the belief that the goods imported by him fall...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 (a) and (b) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Abetment in mis-declaration of goods and evasion of duty - The appellants were accused of being...

Duty demand - collection excess duty from customers on sale of import goods - duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act cannot be demanded on imported custom...

Extended period of limitation - Demand of differential duty alongwith ineterst and penalty - The Assessing Officer would have checked and asked for the RSP of the motor...

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

Demand duty - Imported one consignment of ‘Bed sheet’, declared as made of “100% Polyester” - mis-declaration the goods - The Tribunal observed that, the articles which...

Respondent issued show cause notice alleging import of prohibited goods. Petitioner replied and attended personal hearing. Impugned order did not discuss hazardous waste...

Confiscation of goods and levy of penalty - Import of Pair of Shoes - mis-declaration/suppression in the import documents - Non-compliance of the provisions of the IPR...

The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported goods and stored them in a licensed warehouse u/s 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. These goods were destroyed in a...

Confiscation - redemption fine - penalty - Classification of imported goods - Aluminium Profile - It is not the case of Revenue that the appellants had mis-declared the...

The appellant imported capital goods under an EPCG (Export Promotion Capital Goods) license issued by the DGFT (Directorate General of Foreign Trade). The department...

In the case before CESTAT Bangalore, the issue revolved around mis-declaration of import value, duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalty imposition. The...

Valuation of export goods - rejection of declared value - claim of duty drawback wrongfully - the said concealment was nothing but an afterthought to cover up the...

The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and...

Valuation of the imported goods - Mis-classification of goods - While the CESTAT upheld the under-valuation allegation, it dropped the demand related to...

Quick Updates: