Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - merely because the part of the addition ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 30, 2012

Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - merely because the part of the addition has been confirmed by the Tribunal and the assessee has not filed appeal before the Hon’ble High Court does not mean that the assessee is liable to penalty u/s 158 BFA(2). - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - merely because the part of the addition ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 30, 2012

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty under section 158BFA(2) - Assessment proceedings and penalty proceedings are different and independent to each other. The addition or part of the addition could...

Addition made u/s 153A on account of undisclosed foreign bank account and interest income thereon - assessee confronted with client profiles from HSBC Bank showing...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - , where complete evidence has been found against the assessee on the basis of which addition of undisclosed income has been made in the hands of...

Estimation of business income - The learned CIT (A) confirmed addition merely harping on non-compliance by assessee before the Assessing Officer and not applying his...

Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - willful attempt - assessee has given the explanation in respect of source of jewellery - no case of imposition of penalty - AT

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

Addition u/s 68 - unsecured loans Addition u/s 2(22)(e) - Deemed dividend - The Tribunal found merit in the Assessee's submissions, noting that all relevant documents...

Addition invoking the provisions of Section 56(2)(ix) - advances received - AO observed that, the assessee had no intention to repay the creditors - The present case,...

Addition u/s 50C r.w.s. 56(2)(vii) (b) - the buyer of the property - The Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that since the assesses were buyers, Section 50C did not apply, and...

The case pertains to the applicability of Section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act on the conversion of tenancy rights into ownership rights by a protected tenant. The key...

The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed the validity of an assessment by the AO on issues beyond those covered by a notice u/s 143(2) issued under CASS for limited scrutiny,...

Quick Updates: