Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2021 Year 2021 This

Refund - Applicability of doctrine of unjust enrichment - ...

Case Laws     Central Excise

October 14, 2021

Refund - Applicability of doctrine of unjust enrichment - Revenue cannot pick and choose the assessment years for challenging the orders having similar effect. Moreover, as observed by the First Appellate Authority, the issue of unjust enrichment has been raised for the first time on the sanction of refund order consequent on finalization of provisional assessment. The authorities have admitted that the credit notes were issued by the assessee to their dealer representing various discounts which have been actually passed on, in accordance with marketing circulars/policies. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

  2. Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

  3. Denial of refund claim - Finalization of provisional assessment - prior to the amendment i.e. 13-7-2006, this doctrine of unjust enrichment was not attracted to refund...

  4. Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

  5. Pre deposit made by VODAFONE shall not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment

  6. Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

  7. Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

  8. The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

  9. The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

  10. Unjust enrichment - refund claim - Section 4A of the Central Excise Act - whether the doctrine of unjust enrichment is attracted where the appellants have cleared the...

  11. Refund claim - finalization of provisional assessment - unjust enrichment - captive consumption - even in respect of captive consumption, unjust enrichment provision is...

  12. Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

  13. Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

  14. Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

  15. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates