Classification of goods - Multi Function Printers - It could not ...

High Court Rules Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction by Denying Benefits for Multi Function Printers under 2007 Notification.

November 16, 2021

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Classification of goods - Multi Function Printers - It could not be said gainsaid that this notification has to be given prospective effect. - These aspects though have been analysed by the Tribunal and benefit has been denied under this notification dated 07.07.2007, on different ground altogether, which was not the subject matter of the appeal. Hence, there are no hesitation to hold that the Tribunal has exceeded its jurisdiction in adjudicating upon other issues which were not considered by either the Assessing Authority or Appellate Authority for denying the benefit of notification - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Classification of goods - Multi Function Printers - It could not ...

High Court Rules Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction by Denying Benefits for Multi Function Printers under 2007 Notification.

November 16, 2021

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

CE - a multi-piece package if total weight exceeds 10gms, duty to paid under MRP

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of denying exemption from duty on the import of specific goods due to a realignment of tariff headings. The Tribunal...

Determining the jurisdiction of appellate forum - jurisdiction of this Tribunal - The Tribunal refers to the legal precedent established in a Supreme Court case...

Rightful owners of 4000 shares or not - Exercise of jurisdiction u/s 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act - The Appellate Tribunal emphasizes that the NCLT's...

Tribunal - it is crucial that these tribunals are run by a robust mix of experts, i.e. those with experience in policy in the relevant field, and those with judicial or...

Jurisdiction of CIT (A) while passing an order in appeal u/s 250 - Validity of assessment framed without issue of notice u/s. 143(2) - whether CIT (A) has exceeded his...

Rebate – jurisdiction of Tribunal – exclusion of the jurisdiction of the appellate Tribunal is expressly stated in the Statute - Tribunal was in error in entertaining...

Maintainability of writ - Tribunal functioning within the State of Maharashtra exercise jurisdiction in breach of principles of natural justice or in flagrant disregard...

CESTAT held that appellant was entitled to benefit under N/N. 94/96-Cus for imported goods that were initially exported and returned. While the adjudicating authority...

Contempt proceedings - The Tribunal (NCLT) and the Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have the same ‘jurisdiction’, ‘powers’ and ‘Authority’ in respect of contempt of it as the...

Powers of the DRP u/s 144C(8) - Tribunal was not right in holding that the DRP exceeded its jurisdiction in passing the order. In any event, the order passed by the DRP...

The High Court directed the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to amend the shipping bills u/s 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, and process the claim for the...

Benefit of exemption N/N. 06/2002-CEX - Import of Soft Flow Dyeing Machine - the soft flow eyeing machine complete with multi function stock tank are nothing but soft...

The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the assessee, a trust registered u/s 12AA, qualified for exemption u/s 11 as a charitable entity. The AO argued the trust's...

Jurisdiction powers to issue Reopening notice in metro city - It was established that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued by an Income Tax Officer (ITO),...

Quick Updates: