Refund claim - petitioner had not filed returns either u/s ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 17, 2021

Refund claim - petitioner had not filed returns either u/s 139(1) or within the extended period u/s 139 (4) - Since the law mandates a particular thing to be done in a particular manner, it was incumbent on the part of the second respondent or the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer ought to have issued a notice under Section 148 to determine the tax liability of the petitioner. As this was not done, case deserves to be remitted back to the second respondent to first finalize the assessment of the petitioner for the assessment year 2011-12 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Failure to issue a notice under Section 148 of the IT Act, 1961, cannot be to the prejudice of the petitioner, if ultimately it is found that petitioner was entitled to a refund. However, liberty is given to penalise the petitioner for failure to file returns in time and for levy of interest if any. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - petitioner had not filed returns either u/s ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 17, 2021

You may also like:

Penalty u/s.271AAB - Belated filing of regular return after search - Penalty cannot be levied u/s.271AAB of the Act, in respect of income disclosed in regular return of...

Capital gain - period of limitation for deposit the amount in Capital Gain Account Scheme - Sub-Section (4) of Section 139 provides extended period of limitation as an...

Claim of depreciation at higher rate - failure to file return of income (ITR) within the time limit prescribed u/s 139(1) - since the return was filing within the...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Eligibility to claim deduction u/s 80IB - Return not filed within time limit u/s 139(1) - ub-section (1) and (4) of section 139 have to be read together - AT

LTCG deductions claimed u/s 54B are allowed if the capital gain is utilized for purchasing a new asset before the date of furnishing the return of income u/s 139,...

Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - declaration of additional income u/s.132(4) - due date of filing of return - Once the legislature has not specified the “due date“ as provided in...

Extending the due date for filing returns u/s 139(1) - seeking extension of time in Kerala also since the time limit for filing returns in terms of Section 139(1) for...

Disallowance of deduction u/s. 54B - Belated filing of return - Due date for furnishing the return of income as per section 139(1) is subject to the extended period...

Deduction u/s 80P - there was a few-month delay in filing the ITR by the assessee and ITR was filed within due date permissible u/s 139(4) of the Act, in which the claim...

Deduction u/s 80P - return of income was not filed within the due date prescribed u/s 139(1) - looking into the totality of facts, we are of the view that claim of...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

Denial of deduction u/s 80P by invoking section 80A(5) – if the return was not filed either u/s 139(1) or 139(4) or in pursuance of notice issued u/s 142(1) or u/s 148,...

Quick Updates: