Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2022 Year 2022 This

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - AO framed assessment order on died ...


Assessing Officer's order invalid due to lack of notice; dissolved company tax proceedings quashed u/s 263.

January 20, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - AO framed assessment order on died company - in the absence of a valid notice, the AO has no authority to assume the jurisdiction to assess the tax liability, therefore continuation of the proceeding under the Income Tax Act, pursuant to such invalid notice, in the name of dissolved (dead) company, is without authority of law. Therefore, impugned notice as well as the proceedings taken pursuant thereto, therefore, cannot be sustained. Therefore, we quash the consequential order passed by the ld PCIT under section 263.- AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of reassessment proceedings against non-existent entities or amalgamating companies. The key points are: 1) Initiating or continuing proceedings against a...

  2. Validity of Assessment order against the Company dissolved u/s 560(5) of the Companies Act - appellant-company was struck off from the Register of Companies and stood...

  3. The High Court held that initiating tax assessment u/s CGST Act against a dissolved company is a jurisdictional defect, not a procedural one. Once a company is dissolved...

  4. Company liquidation proceedings warrant termination due to complete winding up, lack of funds, or other reasons preventing continuation. Court dissolved company,...

  5. Dissolution of company sought u/s 481 of Companies Act, 1956. Court opined liquidation proceedings warranted termination, company should be dissolved as Official...

  6. ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

  7. Court ordered dissolution of company and discharged Official Liquidator as Liquidator u/s 481 of Companies Act, 1956 as Official Liquidator could not proceed further...

  8. This case deals with the validity of assessment proceedings initiated against an amalgamated company for the assessment year 2018-19. The key points are: The Assessing...

  9. The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 against a non-existent entity, i.e., the amalgamating company that had ceased to exist due to an approved...

  10. The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

  11. Seeking winding up of respondent company - Failure to pay outstanding dues - section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 - The court noted the substantial unpaid amount...

  12. HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated against a dissolved company, finding them without jurisdiction and contrary to law. The proceedings violated statutory...

  13. Validity of assessment proceedings - Assessment on Amalgamated company - Assessment on a company which has been dissolved and struck off the register of companies u/s...

  14. HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

  15. The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding it to be a case of "change of opinion" and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates