Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee clearly had a ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 2, 2022

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee clearly had a bonafide explanation for not adding the unpaid tax liabilities to its income since it was contesting the very levy of the same before the concerned department. It may be a fit case of making addition of the unpaid liabilities to the income of the assessee. But as far as the levy of penalty is concerned the explanation for not adding back the unpaid liabilities to its income cannot be outrightly rejected as not being bonafide. - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee clearly had a ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 2, 2022

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - unexplained cash deposited in bank - revised return of income filled - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained as the assessee had came...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disclosure of additional income consequent to survey operation - the explanations of the assessee that he has declared additional income...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - penalty cannot be levied where a bonafide claim of the assessee was rejected by the tax department. - AT

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is no ‘tax sought to be evaded’, in terms of Explanation 4 to section 271(1)(c), on which penalty could be levied - even as the asessee has...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

Quick Updates: