Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2022 Year 2022 This

Recovery of interest and imposition of penalty under Sections 77 ...

February 19, 2022

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

Recovery of interest and imposition of penalty under Sections 77 & 78 is justified - Rule 14(1)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 provides that where the CENVAT Credit had been taken wrongly but not utilized, the same shall be recovered under the provisions of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 as the case may be. Further Rule 14(1)(ii) provides that where CENVAT Credit has been taken and utilized wrongly or has been erroneously refunded the same shall be recovered along with interest - there is clear distinction made in the statute that interest is to be recovered only in case of utilization of CENVAT Credit taken wrongly. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Waiver of penalty u/s 78 was allowed but waiver of penalty u/s 76 was refused by the tribunal - once the assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for the failure....

  2. Extended period of limitation - demand of service tax with penalty - The provisions of section 73(4) of the Finance Act are not applicable because intention of the...

  3. Penalty imposed u/s 76, 77 & 78 - renting of immovable property - case is squarely covered for non imposition of penalties under Section 80A - AT

  4. Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

  5. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  6. The question of penalty proceedings would arise only when there could be valid recovery proceedings under Section 73(1) of the Act. That is the reason when the ‘non...

  7. The Court held that when a company fails to register a charge as mandated u/s 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, insisting on digital signatures from the company itself...

  8. Demand of service tax from the Sub-contractor - Demand of service tax with interest confirmed - Levy of penalty u/s 77 & 78 waived invoking the provisions of section 80- AT

  9. Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

  10. CENVAT Credit - Imposition of interest on unutilized credit - Rule 14 - whether a mere taken of CENVAT credit facilities without actually using it, would carry interest...

  11. Levy of penalty - There are no reason why the said benefit cannot be extended to the penalty imposed under Section 76, since both the Sections are to be read along with...

  12. Imposition of penalties u/s 76, 77 and 78 - Service tax payment on reverse charge basis is available as Cenvat Credit - In a Revenue neutral situation no intention to...

  13. Penalty under Sections 77 and 78 - delayed payment of service tax - The statutory levies cannot be obviated for so long merely because the computer was down - levy of...

  14. Penalty - ignorance of law - misguidance by the Consultant - ignorance of law is enough to set-aside penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - AT

  15. Denial of refund claimed u/s 142(3) of CGST Act for service tax paid under RCM was incorrect. Rule 9(1)(e) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 applies, not Rule 9(1)(bb),...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates