Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 - petitioner ...

Court Quashes Penalty u/s 129(3) CGST Act for Technical Breach; No Tax Evasion Intent Found.

April 5, 2022

Case Laws GST HC

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 - petitioner has generated E-way bill by declaring the consignee as its additional place of business - intent to evade tax, present or not - Considering the fact that there is only a technical breach committed by the petitioner and there is no intention to evade tax, the impugned order is quashed and this writ petition is allowed by directing the respondent to release the vehicle and the consignment to the petitioner, if the same has not been released already. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 - petitioner ...

Court Quashes Penalty u/s 129(3) CGST Act for Technical Breach; No Tax Evasion Intent Found.

April 5, 2022

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - Referencing the judgment in M/s Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd.'s case, the Court observed that the...

The Rajasthan High Court considered a case involving the detention of goods due to an expired e-way bill, raising concerns about tax evasion. Citing a judgment from the...

The case involved a challenge to a penalty imposed u/s 129 of the Goods and Service Tax Acts. The court held that without proof of intent to evade tax, such penalties...

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

Levy of Penalty order u/s 129(3) - Neither in the SCN nor in the order u/s 129(3) there was any allegation that non downloading of E-way Bill-02 was done with intention...

Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

Intent to evade tax or not - Challenged the physical inspection and verification report - Penalty - detention on the ground that address of the consigner not found...

Procedural irregularities without fraudulent intent do not warrant harsh penalties u/s 129 of GST enactments. HC quashed impugned order due to procedural nature of...

Section 129 of CGST Act constitutes statutory penalty provision overriding others, but cannot override Section 126 principles of moderation for minor breaches. HC held...

The High Court addressed penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 following premises search. Relying on precedent, the Court held that...

E-Way Bill was not properly filled, but upon inspection, no discrepancy was found between the physically available goods and the goods disclosed in the E-Way Bill. The...

Detention of goods due to incomplete Part B of E-way bill. No dispute on documents/goods. Part B filled before notice/seizure order. No mens rea found to evade tax....

HC set aside penalty orders under GST Act Section 129(1) and allowed refund application. The appellate authority's dismissal was deemed unjustified as there was no clear...

Quick Updates: