Profiteering - four towers/blocks of the project Celebrity ...

Case Laws GST

June 30, 2022

Profiteering - four towers/blocks of the project Celebrity Gardens - The Authority finds and determines that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 1,54,269/- for the project 'Celebrity Garden Block K' during the period of investigation i.e. 01.07.2017 to 30.09.2019. The above amount that has been profiteered by the Respondent from his Home buyers in the above mentioned project. The claim of their refund along with the interest @18% thereon, from the date when the above amount was profiteered by him till the date of such payment, in line with the provisions of Rule 133 (3) (b) of the CGST Rules 2017, need to be verified by the concerned CGST/SGST Commissionerate - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - four towers/blocks of the project Celebrity ...

Case Laws GST

June 30, 2022

You may also like:

Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The Authority finds that, had the Respondent excluded the land...

Profiteering - Construction Service supplied by the Respondent - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - The Authority finds no reason to differ from the detailed computation of profiteered amount by the DGAP or the methodology adopted by...

Order of the Anti Profiteering authority - GST Rule 133 as amended.

Anti-Profiteering - Order of the Authority - Rule 133 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as amended.

Anti-Profiteering - Duties of the Authority - Rule 127 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as amended.

Anti-Profiteering - Secretary to the Authority - Rule 125 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as amended

Anti-Profiteering Authority - Certain provisions under Rules 120, 122 and 124 of GST Rules 2017 amended.

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - it is alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by way of commensurate reduction in the...

The case involved a dispute over the classification of services provided under turnkey contracts as either Consulting Engineering Services or Works Contract Services....

Profiteering - The instant case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 as the Respondent is not executing any...

Introduction of block assessment provisions in cases of search u/s 132 and requisition u/s 132A for early finalization of search assessments, coordinated investigation,...

Profiteering - Project Suncity Avenue-102 - The Authority determines that the Respondent has profiteered an amount of Rs. 2,62,56,652/-. Therefore, given the above...

Depreciation disallowed on the reason that 4 trademarks have been included in the block of assets are not put to use - in relation to block of assets, it is not possible...

Profiteering - purchased a flat in the Respondent's project - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of...

Quick Updates: