Interpretation of Regulation 10 of the SEBI (Substantial ...

SEBI's New Interpretation of Regulation 10 Raises Fairness Concerns Over Retroactive Application and Consistent Enforcement Practices.

July 14, 2022

Case Laws SEBI SC

Interpretation of Regulation 10 of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - In the context of the present case, it is to be noted that the Board is the draftsman of the legislation having enacted the Takeover Regulations 1997 and hence, their interpretation and understanding of the Regulations is of importance and relevance. In the context of the present case, the Board, nearly five years after the transactions, had issued the show-cause notice and then passed an order taking a view on interpretation of Regulation 10, which was contrary to the view expressed by it in several communications as also orders passed by the adjudicating authority. Past is passed and not present, and by giving ‘retroactive’ operation without good reason. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Interpretation of Regulation 10 of the SEBI (Substantial ...

SEBI's New Interpretation of Regulation 10 Raises Fairness Concerns Over Retroactive Application and Consistent Enforcement Practices.

July 14, 2022

Case Laws SEBI SC

You may also like:

Rejection of an application filed u/s 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by the Appellant, where the State Bank of India (SBI) had initiated proceedings u/s...

CIRP - default of the Corporate Debtor in paying the dues of Noida Authority - The Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in allowing Section 65 Applications...

Gratuity exemption u/s Section 10(10)(iii) - exemption limit raised to ₹ 25 lakhs

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the show cause notice issued by SEBI. The key findings were: the arguments of delay, laches, review, revisit, double...

This case pertains to the precedence and priority of consideration between an application filed u/s 54(C) and Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)...

Classification of imported Automatic Data Processing Machines (ADP) - Desktop Computer - to be classified under Tariff Item 8471 50 00 or under Tariff Item 8471 30 10? -...

Condone delay in fling the application for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) - We feel that even at this stage petitioner may approach CBDT under section 119(2)(b) seeking a...

Exemption u/s 10(23FB) -Venture Capital Fund [VCF] - investments in Convertible Debenture application money - violation of SEBI (Venture Capital Fund) Regulations -...

Offence under SEBI - Whether SEBI is required to disclose documents in the present set of proceedings? - The approach of SEBI, in failing to disclose the documents also...

SC granted liberty to petitioner to raise all legal and factual contentions before concerned authority under Black Money Act and Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018....

Admissibility of application for Advance ruling u/s 245R - Pending case - The pendency has to be considered on the date of filing of the application and there was no...

Initiation of CIRP - a perusal of the present Application would go on to show that it has been filed by the Applicant with an ulterior motive to usurp the provisions of...

Exemption u/s 10(23C) - fresh application after rejection of the original application - there is no specific bar for making fresh application as per Rule 2CA or the...

TDS provisions to be read along with DTAA for computing the tax liability - As per the DTAA, the maximum deduction shall not exceed 10% which the assessee has deducted....

The authority cannot admit the application as the questions raised do not fall under the purview of section 97(2) of the CGST/KSGST Act 2017. Section 98 specifies the...

Quick Updates: