Validity of Warrant of authorization u/s 132 - It was a ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 15, 2022

Validity of Warrant of authorization u/s 132 - It was a reasonable belief drawn by the Revenue that the assessee shall not produce or cause to be produced any books of accounts or other documents which would be useful or relevant to the proceedings under the Act. Such believe was not based upon conjectures but on a bona-fide opinion framed in the ordinary conduct of the affairs by the assessee generally. - Revenue may fail or succeed but that would not be a reason to interfere with the search and seizure operations at the threshold, denying an opportunity to the Revenue to unravel the mystery surrounding the investment made by the assessee. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Warrant of authorization u/s 132 - It was a ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 15, 2022

You may also like:

Validity of proceedings u/s 153A - Whether "no search was conducted” on the assessee? - Observations of the ld. CIT(A) that there was no warrant executed at the address...

Warrant of authorisation u/s 132 - Validity of search proceedings u/s 132(1) - In the absence of existence of any of the three circumstances envisaged u/s 132(1), the...

Search and seizure u/s 132 - sufficiency and insufficiency of reasons to belief for warrant of authorization - Even if it is presumed for a moment that warrant relating...

Search u/s 132 - prohibitory orders passed u/s 132(3) - Since pre-conditions had not been satisfied, the warrant of authorisation would have to be quashed - HC

Scope of section 132 - search and seizure - whether conditions precedent for issuing warrant of authorization under Section 132 does exist in the present case? -...

Proceedings u/s 153A were initiated based on alleged incriminating material found during search, however, the material relied upon was a laptop recovered from Mumbai...

Search u/s 132 is a person specific and not a premises specific - if the name of the assessee against whom the block assessment has been made, does not figure in the...

Use of materials seized and the statement furnished by the third parties against the assessee - the opportunity for the rebuttal to the assessee for the seized documents...

Warrant issued in joint name - if an authorization has been issued under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A in the name of more than one person, the...

Validity of search and seizure u/s 132 - The Bombay High Court quashed the search and seizure actions conducted by the Income Tax Department u/s 132 of the Income Tax...

Validity of Search and seizure operations - Since the petitioners did not furnish adequate and cogent material, we are not inclined to call the respondents to disclose...

Validity of authorization of issue u/s 132 – Notice issued u/s 158BD – at the time of search of the premises, the petitioner infact signed the panchnama, claiming to be...

Smuggling - Gold - It is true that the conduct of the appellants was suspicious - But, the Officers did not have a reasonable belief in the first place to assert that...

Onus lay upon Assessee to displace said presumption. As we have seen that Assessee gave explanation disowning documents stating that same related to some others but...

Validity of Search and seizure action - The Court can examine whether the reasons to believe have a rational connection or are relevant bearing to the formation of such...

Quick Updates: