Profiteering - ervices by way of admission to exhibition of ...

Cinema Ticket Profiteering Case: Rs. 2.67 Crore Overcharge Found; Ticket Prices Must Drop Under CGST Rules 133 (1) & (3) (a.

July 15, 2022

Case Laws GST NAPA

Profiteering - ervices by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films - the profiteering amount is determined as Rs. 2.66,99,340/- as per the provisions of Rule 133 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The Respondent is therefore directed to reduce the prices of his tickets as per the provisions of Rule 133 (3) (a) of the CGST Rules, 2017, keeping in view the reduction in the rate of tax so that the benefit is passed on to the recipients. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - ervices by way of admission to exhibition of ...

Cinema Ticket Profiteering Case: Rs. 2.67 Crore Overcharge Found; Ticket Prices Must Drop Under CGST Rules 133 (1) & (3) (a.

July 15, 2022

Case Laws GST NAPA

You may also like:

Respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema ticket prices above Rs. 100 during 01.01.2019 to...

Respondent resorted to profiteering by not reducing selling price commensurately despite GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema tickets above Rs. 100, from...

Profiteering established by increasing base prices of movie tickets despite GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% for admission tickets above Rs. 100, contravening Section...

Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films where the price of admission ticket was one hundred rupees or less - despite...

Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films - It has been established that the Respondent has profiteered by way of...

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

Profiteering - purchase of fiats - it is alleged that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on to the Applicant No. 1 and Applicant No, 2 by way of...

Profiteering - supply of “Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films”. - The Commission concluded that there was no 'Exception Category' of...

Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The Authority finds that, had the Respondent excluded the land...

The respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on the benefit of GST rate reduction on cinema tickets, realizing an additional Rs. 4,65,549 from recipients. As...

Direct tax collections for FY 2023-24 as of 17.06.2023 show net collections of Rs. 3,79,760 crore, a growth of 11.18% compared to the preceding year. - Gross collections...

Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than...

Profiteering - The Respondent has resorted to profiteering by way of either increasing the base prices of the service while maintaining the same selling prices or by way...

Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films - The Respondent has resorted to profiteering by way of either increasing the...

The Competition Commission of India found that the Respondent engaged in profiteering by not passing on the benefit of reduced GST rates to ticket recipients, resulting...

Quick Updates: