Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2022 Year 2022 This

Levy of equal amount of penalty imposed under the provisions of ...


Penalty u/r 25(1)(d) and Section 11AC Invalid Without Allegation of Fraud or Misstatement in Notice.

August 29, 2022

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Levy of equal amount of penalty imposed under the provisions of Rule 25(1)(d) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - in the absence of any such specific allegation in the show cause notice, the authority cannot mechanically impose penalty under Section 11AC of the Act - The provisions of Section 11AC of the Act are attracted in the event of establishing fraud, collusion or suppression of facts or made any wilful misstatement with an intent to evade payment of duty. This has not been done in the present case. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271 - Defective notice - the allegation should be specific and clear in the penalty notice also because the assessee has to submit reply in the course of...

  2. Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

  3. This case pertains to the utilization of ineligible CENVAT credit by a company. The key points are: The company availed ineligible CENVAT credit amounting to Rs....

  4. Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

  5. Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

  6. Impugned show cause notice for cancellation of GST registration lacks specific allegations, violating principles of natural justice. Notice merely reproduces rule...

  7. Cancellation of registration of petitioner - vague SCN - Apart from making a bald allegation that it had been obtained by means of fraud and wilful misstatement, no...

  8. HC affirmed penalties under Section 74 of CGST Act against petitioner for wilful suppression of facts through non-filing of monthly returns and non-payment of GST....

  9. The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

  10. Show Cause Notice u/s 74 of CGST Act lacks jurisdiction as it fails to establish fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts by petitioner in availing Input Tax...

  11. Benefit of reduced penalty u/s 78 - the appellant had failed to deposit 25% of the imposed penalty before the issuance of show cause notice or within 30 days of...

  12. Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

  13. Waiver of penalty in excess of 25% - irregularity in availing Cenvat Credit - it is clear that the appellant had paid duty along with interest and 25% of penalty on...

  14. Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

  15. Levy of penalty on the directors when there is no charge in the show cause notice or imposing the penalty - By merely providing the notice that the contents be brought...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates