Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2022 Year 2022 This

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - if from the assessment records, it is ...


CIT can't revise assessment u/s 263 if AO conducted due inquiries and taxpayer provided necessary submissions.

November 12, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - if from the assessment records, it is evident that the AO has made due enquiries in response to which assessee has filed its submissions, then even if the assessment order does not discuss all aspects in detail with regards to claim of the assessee, it cannot be held that the order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

  2. Revision u/s 263 - As the assessment was completed after making required amount of enquiry and there was no lake of enquiry or investigation by the AO on the issues...

  3. Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

  4. Revision u/s 263 - Bogus LTCG/Share transaction - as per CIT AO failed to make necessary enquiries to ascertain the actual strength of the company, investment profile of...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - When the order of the AO suffers from a complete lack of enquiry, then the above said principle has no application due to the obvious reason that the...

  6. Revision u/s 263 - For the purpose of exercising jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act, the conclusion that the order of the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of...

  7. The assessment order was passed without verifying the allowability of the cost of improvement as per Section 55(1)(b)(2), rendering it erroneous and prejudicial to...

  8. The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

  9. Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

  10. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - as per CIT AO had failed to verify applicability of the provisions of Section 56(2)(viia) - As far as the invocation of Explanation 2 to...

  11. Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

  12. Revision u/s 263 - order framed u/s 153A - The Tribunal (ITAT) held that, the assessment orders approved u/s 153D cannot be revised u/s 263 without first revising the...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - the AO also mentioned in the order that “The Documents as submitted by the assessee were examined and placed on record”, however no remark on the...

  14. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  15. CIT allowed to invoke Section 263 to revise assessment order due to AO's failure to verify assessee's explanation regarding investment in mutual funds/shares despite...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates