Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

CIT allowed to invoke Section 263 to revise assessment order due ...


Tax authority can revise assessment if AO fails to verify investment explanations, even with post-assessment audit objections.

January 7, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

CIT allowed to invoke Section 263 to revise assessment order due to AO's failure to verify assessee's explanation regarding investment in mutual funds/shares despite audit objections raised after assessment, as per SC ruling in CIT vs. P.V.S. Beedies Pvt. Ltd. allowing reopening based on audit party's factual objections; HC overruled ITAT's reliance on B&A Plantation case regarding scope of Section 263 inquiry.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment solely based on the information from a survey conducted by the Sales Tax Department, without independently examining...

  2. The taxpayer filed an original return which was processed by the CPC. Subsequently, a revised return was filed u/s 139(5) with a self-assessment tax of Rs. 10,820/-....

  3. When the AO rejects the revised return then the whole return is invalid. In case AO makes addition from the revised return then it means that he recognizes the revised...

  4. ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s addition under s.69 regarding unexplained property investment, accepting loan from assessee's mother as legitimate source after verification of...

  5. Withdrawing the excess tax credit for advance tax and self-assessment tax - Rectification u/s 154 - The assessee has to furnish details of different payments of tax by...

  6. Unexplained investment u/s. 69 - Asstt. Comm. of Commercial Taxes estimated the valuation of WIP without mentioning the quantity or rate of the individual item - AO...

  7. The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

  8. Validity of manual revised returns filed - scheme of demerger approved - scheme of arrangement approved by NCLT required Petitioner and Hind Lamps to file revised...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Mere intimation received from any authority cannot lead to immediate presumption but it needs to be verified by the AO and to apply his...

  10. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only...

  11. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  12. The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) invoked Section 263 to revise the Assessing Officer's (AO) order, disallowing the amount paid on termination of an agreement,...

  13. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO has not even made minimum exercise for ascertaining the unsecured loans accepted during the year, under consideration...

  14. Unexplained money u/s 69A or investment u/s 69 - Once an AO finds that an investment has been made, he has to examine the Assessee's explanation as to the source of that...

  15. Addition u/s 68 - CIT-A deleted the entire additions on the basis of few sample shareholders - AO has also not given the breakup of the investment made by the 10 persons...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates