Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2024 Year 2024 This

Revision u/s 263 - Bogus LTCG/Share transaction - as per CIT AO ...


Tribunal Upholds PCIT's Jurisdiction Under Sec 263, Cites AO's Inadequate Inquiry into LTCG and Share Transactions.

May 10, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - Bogus LTCG/Share transaction - as per CIT AO failed to make necessary enquiries to ascertain the actual strength of the company, investment profile of the assessee - The Tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the PCIT under section 263, emphasizing the lack of adequate examination of facts in the AO's assessment order. It concurred with the PCIT's finding that the AO failed to conduct necessary inquiries, leading to an erroneous assessment order. However, the Tribunal dismissed the allegation of violation of principles of natural justice, noting that the assessee was provided with opportunities to be heard.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Distinction between "lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry" emphasized. Assessee underwent rigorous assessment proceedings with multiple notices and replies. AO...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

  3. The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

  4. The ITAT upheld the revision order u/s 263 The PCIT demonstrated that the Assessing Officer failed to examine/inquire/investigate transactions in the demat account, bank...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the validity of a Limited scrutiny Assessment. The PCIT observed that the AO did not...

  6. The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

  7. The ITAT Jaipur addressed a case involving a revision u/s 263 concerning the addition u/s 68 based on a report from an investigation in Mumbai. The PCIT contended that...

  8. Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

  9. The assessee claimed exemption from long-term capital gains tax on the sale of agricultural land situated beyond the prescribed distance from municipal limits. The...

  10. The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

  11. Revision u/s 263 - receipt of on-money - incriminating material found in search or not? - PCIT should himself have conducted the enquiry or causing to make such...

  12. Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

  13. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the allowability of provisions claimed by the assessee. The Principal Commissioner of...

  14. The assessee was allowed deduction u/s 54/54F without proper examination of relevant details and materials. The Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s 143(3)...

  15. Revision u/s 263 - Deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) with respect to write off of interest - CIT could not invoke jurisdiction u/s 263 as the view taken by the AO was a...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates