Validity of the final assessment order due to non-service of the ...

November 19, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of the final assessment order due to non-service of the Dispute Resolution Panel’s (DRP) directions - AR candidly admitted before the Tribunal that, on the assessee writing to the DRP about non-communication of the direction, the DRP responded by mentioning that direction dated 11-03-2021 was promptly e-mailed to the assessee on that very date itself. No adverse contrary evidence has been brought to our notice on behalf of the assessee. Under such circumstances, we are satisfied that this ground is devoid of merit and hence deserves the fate of dismissal. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of the final assessment order due to non-service of the ...

November 19, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Dispute Resolution Panel - Reference to - Reconstitution of DRP at Mumbai - 1 - Order-Instruction

Power of DRP to enhance the assessment u/s 144C(5) - The Dispute Resolution Panel being an Expert Panel, is bound to ascertain the correctness or otherwise of the Draft...

TP - The findings or the premise taken by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) in the subsequent year does not render the findings in the previous years per se illegal or...

Final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) subsequent to Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)/Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) directions deemed invalid...

The case involves the validity of a final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144(C)(3) beyond the period of limitation. The Dispute Resolution...

Income–tax (Dispute Resolution Panel) (First Amendment) Rules, 2018

Section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) - Reference to - Constitution of DRP at specified places - Cir. No. 1/FT&TR/2012 Dated: January 31, 2012

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - The ITAT held that the order issued by the AO was a final assessment order disguised as a draft, violating section 144C of...

Transfer pricing officer (TPO) erred by considering non-associated enterprise (non-AE) revenue and costs while computing transfer pricing (TP) adjustment, contrary to...

Non-passing of separate draft order pursuant to restoration by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) - non- adhering statutorily mandated procedure - Order of DRP restoring...

Section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Dispute resolution Panel-Reference to - Reconstitution of DRP at specified areas of jurisdiction. - Order-Instruction

The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order. Despite the alleged violation of statutory procedure u/s 144B, the Tribunal found that the assessment...

Transfer pricing adjustments, selection of the most appropriate method (MAM), benchmarking approach (aggregation or segregation), factual rendering of services, arm's...

Deduction u/s 10B - Directions of DRP u/s 144C - It appears it is not as if the matter has been concluded by the Dispute Resolution Panel. Rather it has kept open the...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144C(4) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax...

Quick Updates: