Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - The ITAT held ...

Tax Assessment Order Misclassified, Violates Section 144C; Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee, Declares Orders Null.

April 15, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - The ITAT held that the order issued by the AO was a final assessment order disguised as a draft, violating section 144C of the Act. This section mandates that a draft order must be issued first, allowing the assessee to file objections with the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) before finalizing the assessment. The inclusion of penalty notices and demand under section 156 alongside the draft/final order further supported the Tribunal's conclusion that the order was final. The Tribunal concluded that the appeal by the assessee was to be allowed and the orders by the lower authorities were declared non est (non-existent for legal purposes).

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - The ITAT held ...

Tax Assessment Order Misclassified, Violates Section 144C; Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee, Declares Orders Null.

April 15, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The case pertains to the levy of interest u/s 234C for failure on the part of the payer to deduct tax deducted at source (TDS) u/ss 196D and 194LD. The key points are:...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving additions u/s 68 where the assessee declared income u/s 44AD for trading grey clothes. The Assessing Officer deemed...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Assessee did not disclose non-eligibility...

The assessee, after being amalgamated with another company, treated the excess consideration paid over the net assets acquired as goodwill and claimed depreciation at...

The assessee, a trust, claimed to be taxed at the same rate applicable to its beneficiary u/s 115BAA. However, this claim was dismissed as the assessee was not treated...

Accrual of income in India - PE in India or not? - UK DTAA - Taxability of receipts from offshore supply on presumptive basis u/s 44BB - Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the receipt from supply planning services was not taxable as fees for technical services or royalty under the India-United...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning service tax on payments made by appellant to overseas logistics agents. Tribunal held that pre-April 2006 demand of Rs. 11,97,047 was...

The ITAT held that the order passed u/s 263 by the PCIT was in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal observed that the order disregarded the...

CENVAT Credit - input service - non-payment of service tax on Ocean Freight - non-payment of service tax on Government Fees under RCM - The Appellate Tribunal considered...

Income assessed in hands of Appellant as Representative Assessee. No credit for prepaid taxes availed by beneficiaries. JCIT(A) directed AO to verify claim of prepaid...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

The case involved a dispute over short collection of TDS due to lower TDS certificates with different TANs issued by deductees. The Central Processing Centre (CPC)...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Quick Updates: