The case involves the validity of a final assessment order ...

In a tax dispute, the panel rejected time-barred objections, upholding the original order u/s 144C. However, the final assessment order was found invalid due to lack of communication.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2024

The case involves the validity of a final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144(C)(3) beyond the period of limitation. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) plays a crucial role in deciding on objections raised by the assessee. The law mandates that the assessment order must be passed within one month from the end of the month in which the objections filing period expires. The DRP can confirm, reduce, or enhance the variations proposed in the draft order. In this case, the DRP rejected the objections as being time-barred, which effectively confirmed the draft order. However, this confirmation does not extend the limitation for passing the final order. As the DRP's directions were not communicated as required by law, the final order passed by the AO u/s 144C(13) was found to be without jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeals were allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involves the validity of a final assessment order ...

In a tax dispute, the panel rejected time-barred objections, upholding the original order u/s 144C. However, the final assessment order was found invalid due to lack of communication.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2024

You may also like:

Rejection of cross objections as time barred - in the Act, no such time period is prescribed. Time fixed by the learned Appellate Authority was fixed by him and there...

Income–tax (Dispute Resolution Panel) (First Amendment) Rules, 2018

Initiation of CIRP - Period of Limitation - Exclusion of certain period - NCLT rejected the application - The Adjudicating Authority has committed error in rejecting the...

Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

Dispute Resolution Panel - Reference to - Reconstitution of DRP at Mumbai - 1 - Order-Instruction

TPA - the assessee cannot seek to raise an issue before the Tribunal in respect of which he has not filed any objection before the Dispute Resolution Panel nor has the...

Eligibility for Input Tax Credit - Failure to report outward supply - The objection of the petitioner is that most of these items do not fall within the reverse charge...

Power of DRP to enhance the assessment u/s 144C(5) - The Dispute Resolution Panel being an Expert Panel, is bound to ascertain the correctness or otherwise of the Draft...

Imposition of penalty - Smuggling - Gold bars of foreign origin - illegally imported goods - CESTAT held that, once the two Appellants disputed the fact of recovery of...

Jurisdiction of AO u/s 124 - transfer of case - The purpose of the prescribing the limitation for raising such objection u/s 124(3)(a), is to ensure that such objections...

Initiation of CIRP - The Corporate Debtor is not to raise bogie of disputes but there has to be real substantial dispute. The existence of dispute when the Demand Notice...

Rejection of claims which are delayed - When an Application under Section 7 cannot be entertained for a debt, which is barred by time and is liable to be rejected, any...

The High Court addressed the jurisdictional conflict between Civil Court and NCLT/NCLAT in a dispute over share transfer/title. The plaint was rejected based on SPA's...

Input Tax Credit - solar power panels procured and installed - blocked credit- When Electricity energy manufactured using the Solar Panels were supplied to TANGEDCO...

Non consideration of objections to the draft assessment order u/s 144 - since the objections were well within time, the action of the AO in proceeding with the final...

Quick Updates: