Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2023 Year 2023 This

Addition u/s. 68 - satisfaction regarding the identity and ...


Section 68 Addition Confirmed: Investors' Identity and Creditworthiness Questioned, Non-filing of Tax Returns Key Factor.

January 19, 2023

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition u/s. 68 - satisfaction regarding the identity and creditworthiness of the 13 investors who have invested in the share capital of the assessee company and the genuineness of the transaction - none of the investors has filed his/her return of income which would have alerted the ld.CIT(A) before taking the decision by deleting the addition made by the AO u/s. 68. - Additions confirmed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

  2. Addition u/s 68 - bogus share capital & share premium - The assessee failed to prove that the transactions of share application money is genuine and the creditworthiness...

  3. In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

  4. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. The assessee furnished all evidence proving identity, creditworthiness of investors, and genuineness of transactions regarding...

  5. Power of CIT(A) in enhancing the addition - violating the law u/s 251(2) - enhancement of addition made u/s. 68 - the assessee had discharged its onus to prove the...

  6. Addition under section 68 being share capital received and addition under section 69C on account of commission - some of Directors did not appear in the case of assessee...

  7. Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

  8. Assessment u/s 68 - unexplained cash credit - Tribunal, as a matter of fact, did not inquire into the financials of investor companies and, therefore, according to us,...

  9. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the...

  10. Addition u/s 68 - the provision of 68 does not speak about mere belief of the Revenue in regard to the proof of the genuineness of the transaction as well as identity...

  11. The assessee company received share capital and share application money from 13 share applicants. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition u/s 68, alleging that the...

  12. The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness,...

  13. Addition u/s 68 - share capital and share premium - allegation regarding identity and creditworthiness - non appearance of director - addition cannot be sustained merely...

  14. Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained loans - the appellant by filing ample documentary evidences sought to justify the identity and creditworthiness of the parties and...

  15. Assessee challenged addition on account of unproved sundry creditors u/s 41(1), contending evidence of liability cessation was provided. AO held assessee failed to prove...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates