It is an imperative duty of the authorities to be updated with ...

Authorities Must Stay Updated on Laws to Avoid Court Burdens Due to Ignorance in Decision-Making and Order Issuance.

February 18, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

It is an imperative duty of the authorities to be updated with the law and to apply it to the case at hand before taking decisions and passing orders. Feigning ignorance of law by authorities only increases the burden of the Courts. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

It is an imperative duty of the authorities to be updated with ...

Authorities Must Stay Updated on Laws to Avoid Court Burdens Due to Ignorance in Decision-Making and Order Issuance.

February 18, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

GST Council Decisions - as updated on 20-9-2019 after 37th Meeting

GST Council Decisions - GST on goods and services - Latest updates

Condonation of delay denied - Ignorance of law is no excuse - HC

Condonation of delay – Ignorance of law is not an excuse - delay not condoned - AT

Penalty - ignorance of law - misguidance by the Consultant - ignorance of law is enough to set-aside penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - AT

Condonation of delay in filing of return of income (ITR) - petitioner claimed that he is a foreign citizen having ASCII status and he cannot be reasonably expected to...

Penalty levied u/s. 272A (1)(c) - non compliance with summons issued under section 131(1A) - ignorance of law is certainly no excuse for a default committed but, at the...

Penalty levied under Sec.271C - Ignorance of law, it is trite, is no excuse in law and if that be so, ignorance of law cannot also be a reasonable cause as contemplated...

Legality of revision of order of Tribunal u/s 254 on ground of retrospective overruling - Judicial decision acts retrospectively. Judges do not make law they only...

The Authorities of the State are not expected to take advantage of a citizen / assessee’s ignorance. - It is not open to the Authority to ignore the evidence /...

It is well settled in law that a decision of the court is only an authority for what it decides and not what can logically be deduced therefrom. It cannot be quoted for...

The CESTAT held that the revenue authorities cannot adopt an inconsistent stand in subsequent proceedings when the facts are identical, unless there is a change in law....

Prayer for direction for placing the Settlement Proposal submitted by the Appellant before the CoC for consideration - CoC unanimously decided to reject the proposal...

Stay petition before appellate authority - CBDT circular regarding stay of demand does not seem to bind the appellate authority, though it binds at the lower echelons.

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Quick Updates: