Legality of revision of order of Tribunal u/s 254 on ground of ...

Revising Tribunal Orders: Supreme Court's Overruling u/s 254 Applies Retrospectively as New Legal Interpretation.

June 3, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Legality of revision of order of Tribunal u/s 254 on ground of retrospective overruling - Judicial decision acts retrospectively. Judges do not make law they only discover or find the law. Thus, where a decision of the Supreme Court overrules an earlier decision, the views expressed in the later decision would have to be regarded as having always been the law. The overruling is, therefore, retrospective. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Legality of revision of order of Tribunal u/s 254 on ground of ...

Revising Tribunal Orders: Supreme Court's Overruling u/s 254 Applies Retrospectively as New Legal Interpretation.

June 3, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

Rectification u/s 254 - The High Court acknowledges that the Tribunal is the final authority to ascertain facts. However, it must rectify any apparent mistakes in its...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court - When the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the order passed by them,...

Revision u/s 263 - period of limitation - In the garb of revising the order of AO dated 14.03.2013 passed u/s 254 r.w.s.143(3) of the Act, the CT was virtually seeking...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - If such prayer is allowed then in every case, where the assessee is not satisfied with the finding of the Tribunal, the MA will be...

Rectification u/s 254 - Addition u/s 68 - non-consideration of certain facts in Order of the Tribunal - ignoring the material already on record on the part of the...

Revised computation v/s revised return of income- Rectified computation of income submitted during the course of assessment proceedings - CBDT Circular states that...

Doctrine of merger applied to impugned order of Appellate Tribunal imposing penalty on appellant. Held that since Supreme Court's judgment on appeal against Tribunal's...

The HC held that the Tribunal erred in exercising jurisdiction u/s 254(2) to set aside the additions made by the AO regarding delayed payment of statutory dues like PF...

Power of tribunal recalling an earlier order in exercise of powers for rectification u/s 254 - ITAT, by majority order, recalled the order - No reason was shown by the...

The assessing officer (AO) is empowered u/s 275(1A) to revise the penalty order by giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee within six months from the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

Rectification u/s 254 - period of limitation of 6 months - For one reason or the other, the Tribunal may not be in a position to pass the order u/s 254(2). For the...

Recall of order u/s 254 - the applicants are merely disputing the findings of the Tribunal and seeking a review of the order of the Tribunal, which is not possible under...

Quick Updates: