Revision u/s 263 by the ld. PCIT - Neither the AO had enquired ...

PCIT Revises Assessment u/s 263 as AO Fails to Investigate Unexplained Cash Deposits by Appellant.

March 14, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 by the ld. PCIT - Neither the AO had enquired into the sources of cash deposits nor the appellant had offered any explanation in support of the sources for cash deposits. This clearly goes to prove the AO had failed to examine this issue during the course of original assessment proceedings, which rendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 by the ld. PCIT - Neither the AO had enquired ...

PCIT Revises Assessment u/s 263 as AO Fails to Investigate Unexplained Cash Deposits by Appellant.

March 14, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - Unexplained cash deposits - Merely because documents, noted by the AO to be produced by the creditor of source of cash deposit in response to summons...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposit during the demonization period - The tribunal noted that the AO had conducted an adequate inquiry into the assessee's cash...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - onus to prove - The Pr. CIT found the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interests due to...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - The tribunal rejected the notion that unexplained deposits prior to withdrawals undermined the explanation provided by the...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - AO is not only an adjudicator, but also an investigator who failed to investigate the source and truth behind the cash...

The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

Revision u/s 263 - Bogus LTCG/Share transaction - as per CIT AO failed to make necessary enquiries to ascertain the actual strength of the company, investment profile of...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of an order passed u/s 143(3) by the Assessing Officer (AO), which was revised by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax...

The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

The AO failed to correctly compute the undisclosed income after considering the correct sale value of land as per Form 26AS. The assessee claimed that one of the lands...

Validity of an ex-parte revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: The PCIT passed...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the saving bank - The tribunal found the orders of the Revenue authorities to be arbitrary, with a failure to consider...

The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO's assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. The unsigned assessment...

ITAT ruled against Principal CIT's revision under Section 263, finding the order procedurally flawed. The tribunal held that PCIT cannot delegate verification...

The ITAT upheld the revision order u/s 263 The PCIT demonstrated that the Assessing Officer failed to examine/inquire/investigate transactions in the demat account, bank...

Quick Updates: