Revision u/s 263 - phrase ‘prejudicial to the interest of the ...

Clarifying "Prejudicial to Revenue" in Section 263: Not All Revenue Losses Warrant Revision of AO's Orders.

February 25, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - phrase ‘prejudicial to the interest of the revenue’ - every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interest of revenue - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - phrase ‘prejudicial to the interest of the ...

Clarifying "Prejudicial to Revenue" in Section 263: Not All Revenue Losses Warrant Revision of AO's Orders.

February 25, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the main allegation was the non-disclosure of agricultural income affecting the deduction u/s 54B. The...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - An incorrect assumption of the fact or an incorrect application of law will satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous. The phrase...

Case involved revision u/s 263 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) setting aside assessment order regarding rent recovered from specified persons and treatment of...

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - An order which is prejudicial to revenue even if no Tax Loss - The High Court found that the AO's assessment did not adequately address...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

The AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interests. The filing fee for increasing share capital was rightly allowed as revenue expenditure,...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT-A - AO’s order is not erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue since mark to market loss incurred by Company on revaluation of...

The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

Revision u/s 263 - any loss of revenue as a consequence of an order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of revenue - AT

The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

Revision u/s 263 - an order prejudicial and erroneous to the revenue - though the order passed by the A.O. is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue but it is not...

AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue - There was a failure on the part of the AO to make such enquiry in order to ascertain the nature of the expenses whether...

Quick Updates: