Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2023 Year 2023 This

Valuation - interconnected units - These two entities charged ...


Entities Manipulated Prices to Avoid Excise Duty; Suppression of Facts Confirmed, Demand Upheld Against Appellant.

June 10, 2023

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Valuation - interconnected units - These two entities charged higher price on the third parties on which no excise duty was paid. Therefore this is not a case where Revenue neutrality will arise. It is a clear case that Appellant was avoiding Excise Duty payment by charging higher price for the supplies made by their interconnected units. - the fact of suppression is also well established - Demand confirmed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

  2. Levy of penalty under Section 11AC - Once the appellant have obtained the NOC and unit was debonded, they intentionally avoided the payment of short duty. It is only on...

  3. Mere non-payment of duties is not collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts - Article

  4. CENVAT Credit - duty paying documents - supplementary invoices issued by their Tuticorin unit - suppression of facts or not - It is seen that the demand of duty on the...

  5. Disallowance of excise duty - an item of section 43B - Since the excise authority held that CENVAT credit on fuel used for generation of electricity supplied to the...

  6. The case involved a dispute regarding the valuation of goods for central excise duty purposes. The Appellate Tribunal held that the price declared by the appellant for...

  7. The CESTAT allowed the appeal. The appellant had been adjusting duty payments considering sale price at factory gate and ex-C&F depot price, resulting in excess and...

  8. Extended period of limitation - The very fact that the appellant is contesting the issue of invoking larger period of limitation, that the rendering of service under the...

  9. CENVAT Credit - duty paying documents - supplementary invoices - duties which became payable by the manufacturer on account of willful misstatement or suppression of...

  10. Valuation - benefit of cum-duty - The abatement of duties and tax to qualify the ‘normal price’ in the Central Excise Act, 1944, as well as in the rules framed for...

  11. Goods manufactured within Special Economic Zone (SEZ) were challenged regarding applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) and Additional Duty of Excise...

  12. Extended period of limitation - In fact in the present case the assessee has been proved to be incorrect in its belief. However to invoke larger period of limitation in...

  13. Invoking the extended period of limitation u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act for recovery of unpaid duty. The key points are: The department alleged suppression of...

  14. Refund of CENVAT credit of CVD and SAD paid by them - appellant has paid the duties only after issuing SCN - there is no allegation of any fraud, collusion or...

  15. Recovery of amount u/s 11D - even if it is assumed that the process of blending of ethanol with motor spirit does not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of Central...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates