Validity of notice proposing levy of penalty - mere initiation ...

Penalty Notice Challenge Only Valid Post-Order, Current Appeal Dismissed as Premature Under Legal Procedure.

June 16, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of notice proposing levy of penalty - mere initiation of penalty proceedings cannot be challenged unless some formal order on the point has been passed in accordance with law. The assessee may challenge the imposition of penalty if so legally advised at appropriate stage. The present appeal is infructuous in effect and substance and thus dismissed in limine. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of notice proposing levy of penalty - mere initiation ...

Penalty Notice Challenge Only Valid Post-Order, Current Appeal Dismissed as Premature Under Legal Procedure.

June 16, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

Penalty u/s 271 - Defective notice - the allegation should be specific and clear in the penalty notice also because the assessee has to submit reply in the course of...

The petitioner, an end user of PVC Suspension Resins, challenged the ongoing anti-dumping duty investigation initiated by the respondent authority. The court dismissed...

Penalty u/s 271AAB - Defects in the notice issued u/s 274 - CIT(A) reduced the penalty to 10% applying provisions of Section 271AAB(a) of the Act as against penalty...

The case deals with the limitation period for initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271E of the Income Tax Act. It is well-established that the limitation period commences...

Penalty proceedings for a default committed by a deceased - legal representatives - Levy of penalty u/s 271B for non-furnishing of Tax Audit Report within the prescribed...

Penalty imposed on trader for importing goods with invalid import declaration form (Form XVI) instead of prescribed Form XVI u/s 48A of Uttarakhand VAT Act. Tribunal...

Penalty imposed u/s 270A(9) for underreporting and misreporting of income was challenged due to non-specification of clear charge. The Tribunal held that underreporting...

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

The Supreme Court declined to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution to challenge the constitutionality of the Electoral Bond Scheme and related...

Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of notice - There was no valid service of notice u/s 148 of the Act in the present case. The finding of the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - An order in the name of dead person - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty order was indeed issued in the name of a deceased...

Recovery of drawback benefit availed along with applicable interest and penalty was demanded through a notice issued against a deceased exporter. The issuance of notice...

HC held that notices under s.148 issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer remain valid despite faceless assessment requirements, as traditional and faceless mechanisms...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Quick Updates: