Valuation of goods - Misdeclaration of export goods - the ...

Appellants Misdeclared Goods as "Rejects"; Rule 7 Valuation Upheld as Neither Arbitrary Nor Illegal.

July 26, 2023

Case Laws Central Excise SC

Valuation of goods - Misdeclaration of export goods - the appellants sold the goods of prime quality mis-declaring the same as “rejects” and the same was sold to the related company UIL. It has been found that the UIL sold the goods at a higher rate. Therefore, the valuation ordered to be done under Rule 7 on the basis of the same cannot be said to be arbitrary and/or illegal. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation of goods - Misdeclaration of export goods - the ...

Appellants Misdeclared Goods as "Rejects"; Rule 7 Valuation Upheld as Neither Arbitrary Nor Illegal.

July 26, 2023

Case Laws Central Excise SC

You may also like:

Valuation of imported goods - No comparable goods, quantity, same country for contemporaneous imports were brought on record. Even as per explanation to Rule 9 of the...

Valuation of goods - method of valuation - sale of goods from depot / customer care center - It is found that the form in which the goods have been sold at depot are in...

Seizure of imported goods - misdeclaration of goods - when the mis-declaration was only in respect of 81 bales, Commissioner proceeded to redetermine the entire quantity...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 (a) and (b) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Abetment in mis-declaration of goods and evasion of duty - The appellants were accused of being...

Classification of imported 'Brush Cutters' misdeclared as 'Power Operated Reapers' to evade higher duty. Tribunal upheld classification under Heading 8467 8990 based on...

Valuation - toothpaste - MRP based valuation - there are lot of assumption and presumption involved and it is highly arbitrary - impugned order cannot be upheld

Contravention of Sections 8(3), 8(4), and 9(1)(b) of FERA established - illegal foreign exchange remittance abroad disguised as charges for imports that never occurred....

Levy of penalty u/s 112 & 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abating the importer - In present import, there is no evidence to allege that appellants were...

Valuation of imported goods - On the one hand OIO says there are no imports of identical or similar goods, and the other hand re-determines the values of some goods on...

Merely, because the appellant had initially made a claim for exemption from duty based on the documents available, it cannot be said that the appellant had misdeclared...

Valuation of imported goods - MRP based valuation or transaction value - CVD - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - In the present case, the appellant has been allowed to redeem the goods on payment of payment of duty. The appellant has...

The case pertains to the valuation and classification of imported goods as old and used second-hand goods or unused new goods. The key points are: The Chartered...

Valuation - Export of Carpets and threading bars - Mis-declaration of description and value - The Tribunal found that while the carpets were misdeclared and subject to...

Method of valuation - Revenue neutrality - Extended period of limitation - goods transferred to another unit for captive consumption - to be valued in accordance with...

Quick Updates: