TP Adjustment - allocate various costs between the ‘Trading’ and ...

Assessee Failed to Allocate Employee Costs and Expenses Between Trading and Manufacturing Segments Despite TPO's Opportunity.

September 15, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

TP Adjustment - allocate various costs between the ‘Trading’ and ‘Manufacturing’ segments - Despite an opportunity granted by the TPO, the assessee still did not come clean by not properly allocating Employee cost, Depreciation and Other expenses as discussed supra. This demonstrates that the assessee failed to properly apportion the expenses between the manufacturing and trading segments, as has been correctly adjudicated by the ld. CIT(A). - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

TP Adjustment - allocate various costs between the ‘Trading’ and ...

Assessee Failed to Allocate Employee Costs and Expenses Between Trading and Manufacturing Segments Despite TPO's Opportunity.

September 15, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The case pertains to the disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80IA by an assessee operating two units, one for paper manufacturing and another for power generation. The...

TP adjustments towards AMP expenditure pertaining to trading segment AND reimbursement of warranty expenses to AE - the AMP expenses and warranty expenses cannot be...

Deduction u/s 80 IB (10) - allowable expenses to project - Since all the administrative expenses cannot be linked to the activities reasonably, it can be allocated...

TP Adjustment - ESOP considered as operating cost by the Ld.AO/TPO - TPO failed to consider the basic fact that, purchase cost of the shares of foreign AE is charged...

Transfer pricing adjustment made to alleged international transaction of AMP expenditure incurred by assessee disallowed due to lack of evidence that assessee agreed to...

Allocating unallocable expenses to each segment in proportion to segmental turnover to total turnover - all common expenses cannot be apportioned in the universal ratio...

Deduction u/s 80-IB(10) - manner of allocating the common expenses - the financial positions of the assessee will represent distorted position if the common expenses are...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction claimed u/s 80IA - there being no factual basis for establishing that the expenses needed to be allocated and the expenses so...

TDS u/s 195 r.w.s. 192 - salary costs of a seconded employee - The employees in their capacity as employees of the assessee had to control and supervise the activities...

Deduction claimed u/s 57 against income returned u/s 56 - manner of apportioning assessee's expenses to earning income u/s 56 disputed - Revenue authorities rejecting...

TDS u/s 195 on payment of secondment cost - The assessee has reimbursed the salary cost of seconded employees on cost-to-cost basis without any profit element. The...

TP Adjustment - comparable selection - where a concern is selected was showing low employee cost to sales ratio, then such concern cannot be selected while benchmarking...

Computation of deduction u/s 80IB/80IC - allocation of advertisement expenses to the eligible units in the ratio of turnover of eligible units to the total turnover of...

Transfer pricing - the TPO proceeded on a false premise that the appellant has not allocated any expenses to the homebase segment, whereas, as demonstrated elsewhere,...

The case involves Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments and the classification of segments for benchmarking purposes. The Appellate Tribunal held that TP adjustments should...

Quick Updates: