Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2023 Year 2023 This

Levy of penalty on employees of company - Recovery of ...


Penalties on Employees for Differential Duty Unjustified Due to Lack of Direct Financial Benefit Evidence.

October 5, 2023

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Levy of penalty on employees of company - Recovery of differential duty - There is no evidence of any pecuniary benefit deriving to the two persons directly or indirectly. - As ‘limbs’ of their respective employer organizations, they may have had a role in the price-setting but with penalizing of the corporate entities that derived the benefit, it would be improper to penalize the ‘limbs’ for vicarious responsibility. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

  2. Levy of redemption fine and penalty - provisional release of goods - the appellant paid entire amount of the differential duty along with interest thereon and 15% duty...

  3. The CESTAT held that interest on differential duty is a statutory liability arising from the date of removal of goods, irrespective of when the differential duty is paid....

  4. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  6. The appellant failed to declare the actual MRP before Customs and sold the imported goods at a higher MRP, evading appropriate customs duty. The CESTAT remanded the...

  7. The High Court correctly distinguished between the jurisdiction vested in every person or public office and the District Registrar in determining penalty on...

  8. CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

  9. The case before CESTAT New Delhi involved fraudulent registration and utilization of duty-free scrips, leading to penalties. The appellant failed to comply with...

  10. Benefit of reduced penalty of 15% u/s 28(5) - Delay in payment of penalty due to Public Holiday - The appellant voluntarily paid the differential BCD and interest upon...

  11. The case revolves around determining whether an employee qualifies as a "workman" u/s 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which would entitle them to certain...

  12. Liability for Penalty & Interest – payment of duty/differential duty, whether before or after the show cause notice is issued cannot alter the liability for payment -...

  13. The case involved a dispute over the valuation of power units supplied by one party to another, leading to a demand for differential duty, interest, and penalty. The...

  14. Interest on differential duty- captive consumption - revenue neutrality - revised CAS-4 prepared by the cost accountant - the liability to pay interest on duties...

  15. Interest on differential duty - payment of duty assessed provisionally - interest would be payable from the due date of payment of provisional duty for the purpose of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates