Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

The appellant failed to declare the actual MRP before Customs ...


Importer Overcharges Lead to Customs Duty Evasion; CESTAT Corrects Adjudicating Authority's Overreach, Upholds Duty Demand.

January 7, 2025

Case Laws     Customs     AT

The appellant failed to declare the actual MRP before Customs and sold the imported goods at a higher MRP, evading appropriate customs duty. The CESTAT remanded the matter for quantifying the differential duty payable. The Adjudicating Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by considering issues already decided by the CESTAT. However, it correctly quantified the differential duty based on evidence of higher sales MRP after providing sufficient opportunity to the appellant. Selling goods at higher MRPs than declared to Customs constitutes a violation, warranting differential duty and penalties. The CESTAT allowed the appeal in part by setting aside the Adjudicating Authority's contrary findings while upholding the quantification of differential duty demand.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CESTAT adjudicated a customs duty dispute involving raw silk fabric imports. The tribunal ruled in favor of the importer, finding that notification conditions deemed...

  2. Interpretation of statute - Section 2(26) of Customs Act - Scope of the term Importer - High Sea Sale - Adjudicating authority treated the appellant neither the importer...

  3. Exemption from IGST - Re-import of aircrafts and parts thereof after repairs - the meaning assigned to duty of customs, as discussed above, is the meaning assigned to...

  4. The statutory regulations have an overruling effect on the contract between parties. The demurrage/detention charges are payable only when goods are not cleared...

  5. The High Court dismissed the petition filed by an informer seeking directions against private respondents (importers of luxury cars) and statutory authorities (Customs,...

  6. LED chips imported were initially self-classified by importer under CTH 85414100. However, LED items are classifiable under CTHs 8539, 8541 and 9404 based on functions....

  7. Levy of Anti Dumping Duty - likelihood of recurrence of dumping and injury in the event of expiry of duty - the designated authority should re-examine whether the...

  8. Customs duty levied on imported goods destroyed by fire in SEZ units. SEZ units procured duty-free goods indigenously, availing exemptions under SEZ Act, 2005 and Rules,...

  9. Refund of the excess Customs duty paid - excess duty collection arisen due to typographical error in the documents provided by the importer - The assessing authority can...

  10. The Tribunal held that the first appellate authority erred in affirming the re-assessment and levy of anti-dumping duty (ADD) u/s 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975,...

  11. Imported flow meters, pressure transmitters, level transmitters, parts and accessories were classified under tariff headings 9032 8990 and 9032 9000 or 9026 of Customs...

  12. Levy of Customs duty - importer of vessel "M.V. Vishwa Yash" or not - deemed importer - as the permission was granted in favour of the SCI, the respondent cannot be said...

  13. Duty demand u/s 28(1) of Customs Act, 1962, upon importer and transferee of license issued by DGFT - Liability of transferee for fraudulently obtained license - Levy of...

  14. Benefit of exemption from customs duty - conversion from foreign going vessel to coastal vessel - It is the option of the importer to pay duty either in terms of clause...

  15. CESTAT overturned the revocation of appellant's Customs Broker License and associated penalties. The Tribunal found no violations of CBLR 2018 Regulations 10(d), 10(m),...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates